FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129  
130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   >>   >|  
d on the east coast, it appeared a fine opportunity for recovering prestige in the west. By presents and promises of protection they induced, it is alleged, the chieftainess of the Iboina people, and the chief of the Tankarana, further north, to cede to them their territories on the mainland, as well as the island of Nosibe, off the north-west coast. These treaties are given by De Clercq, "Recueil de Traites," vol. iv. pp. 594, 597; but whether these half-barbarous Sakalava, ignorant of reading and writing, knew what they were doing, is very doubtful. Nosibe was, however, taken possession of by the French in 1841, and has ever since then remained in their hands; but, curiously enough, until the present year, no claim has ever been put forward to any portion of the mainland, or any attempt made to take possession of it. But these treaties have been lately advanced as justifying very large demands on the part of the French, including (_a_) a protectorate over the portions ceded; (_b_) a protectorate over all the northern part of the island, from Mojanga across to Aritongil Bay; (_c_) a protectorate over all the western side of the island; finally (_d_), "general rights" (whatever these may mean) over all Madagascar! Most English papers have rightly considered these treaties as affording no justification for such large pretensions, although one or two[19] have argued that the London press has unfairly depreciated the strength of French claims. Is this really so? The Malagasy Government and its envoys to Europe have strenuously denied the right of a rebellious tribe to alienate any portion of the country to a foreign power; a right which would never be recognized by any civilized nation, and which they will resist to the last. The following are amongst some of the reasons they urge as vitiating and nullifying any French claim upon the mainland founded upon the 1841 treaties:-- i. The territory claimed had been fairly conquered in war in 1824 by the Hova, and their sovereign rights had for many years never been disputed. ii. The present queen and her predecessors had been acknowledged by the French in their treaties of 1868 and 1862 as sovereigns of Madagascar, without any reserve whatever. (See also _Revue des deux Mondes_, already cited.) iii. Military posts have been established there, and customs duties collected by Hova officials ever since the country was conquered by them, and these have been paid without any
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129  
130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

treaties

 

French

 

mainland

 
island
 
protectorate
 

possession

 

conquered

 

rights

 
Madagascar
 

country


present
 

portion

 

Nosibe

 

rebellious

 

customs

 

duties

 

strenuously

 

denied

 
established
 

Military


alienate

 

foreign

 

collected

 

argued

 

claims

 

London

 

depreciated

 

strength

 

envoys

 

Europe


officials

 

Malagasy

 
Government
 

unfairly

 

territory

 

claimed

 

fairly

 
founded
 
vitiating
 

nullifying


acknowledged

 
disputed
 

sovereign

 

predecessors

 
civilized
 
nation
 

Mondes

 

recognized

 

resist

 

sovereigns