FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296  
297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   >>   >|  
by way of Russia in 1558-1559. The country of which they collected notices at that city was still known to them only as _Cathay_, and its great capital only as _Cambaluc_. Cathay as a supposed separate entity may be considered to come to an end with the journey of Benedict Goes, the lay-Jesuit. This admirable person was, in 1603, despatched through Central Asia by his superiors in India with the specific object of determining whether the Cathay of old European writers and of modern Mahommedans was or was not a distinct region from that China of which parallel marvels had now for some time been recounted. Benedict, as one of his brethren pronounced his epitaph, "seeking Cathay found Heaven." He died at Suchow, the frontier city of China, but not before he had ascertained that China and Cathay were the same. After the publication of the narrative of his journey (in the _Expeditio Christiana apud Sinas_ of Trigault, 1615) inexcusable ignorance alone could continue to distinguish between them, but such ignorance lingered many years longer. (H. Y.) (B)--_Chinese Origins._ Chinese literature contains no record of any kind which might justify us in assuming that the nucleus of the nation may have immigrated from some other part of the world; and the several ingenious theories pointing to Babylonia, Egypt, India, Khotan, and other seats of ancient civilization as the starting-points of ethnical wanderings must be dismissed as untenable. Whether the Chinese were seated in their later homes from times immemorial, as their own historians assume, or whether they arrived there from abroad, as some foreign scholars have pretended, cannot be proved to the satisfaction of historical critics. Indeed, anthropological arguments seem to contradict the idea of any connexion with Babylonians, Egyptians, Assyrians, or Indians. The earliest hieroglyphics of the Chinese, ascribed by them to the Shang dynasty (second millennium B.C.), betray the Mongol character of the nation that invented them by the decided obliquity of the human eye wherever it appears in an ideograph. In a pair of eyes as shown in the most ancient pictorial or sculptural representations in the west, the four corners may be connected by a horizontal straight line; whereas lines drawn through the eyes of one of the oldest Chinese hieroglyphics cross each other at a sharp angle, as shown in the accompanying diagrams:-- [Illustration: Eg
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296  
297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Cathay

 

Chinese

 
journey
 

hieroglyphics

 

ignorance

 
Benedict
 
nation
 
ancient
 

pointing

 

theories


foreign
 

abroad

 

arguments

 
anthropological
 
scholars
 
pretended
 
Babylonia
 

historical

 

satisfaction

 
critics

proved

 

Indeed

 

ingenious

 

assume

 

untenable

 
starting
 

civilization

 

Whether

 

dismissed

 

ethnical


points

 

wanderings

 
seated
 

historians

 

arrived

 

immemorial

 

Khotan

 
betray
 

corners

 

connected


horizontal

 

straight

 

representations

 

pictorial

 

sculptural

 
accompanying
 
diagrams
 

Illustration

 

oldest

 

ideograph