FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106  
107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   >>   >|  
n C is D, A is B_ (none) _If C is D, A is not B_ Sometimes _when C is d, A is B_ (none) Sometimes _when C is d, A is B_ As to Disjunctives, the attempt to put them through these different forms immediately destroys their disjunctive character. Still, given any proposition in the form _A is either B or C_, we can state the propositions that give the sense of obversion, conversion, etc., thus: DATUM.--_A is either B or C;_ OBVERSE.--_A is not both b and c;_ CONVERSE.--_Something, either B or C, is A;_ CONTRAPOSITIVE.--_Nothing that is both b and c is A_. For a Disjunctive in I., of course, there is no Contrapositive. Given a Disjunctive in the form _Either A is B or C is D_, we may write for its Obverse--_In no case is A b, and C at the same time d_. But no Converse or Contrapositive of such a Disjunctive can be obtained, except by first casting it into the hypothetical or categorical form. The reader who wishes to pursue this subject further, will find it elaborately treated in Dr. Keynes' _Formal Logic_, Part II.; to which work the above chapter is indebted. CHAPTER VIII ORDER OF TERMS, EULER'S DIAGRAMS, LOGICAL EQUATIONS, EXISTENTIAL IMPORT OF PROPOSITIONS Sec. 1. Of the terms of a proposition which is the Subject and which the Predicate? In most of the exemplary propositions cited by Logicians it will be found that the subject is a substantive and the predicate an adjective, as in _Men are mortal_. This is the relation of Substance and Attribute which we saw (chap. i. Sec. 5) to be the central type of relations of coinherence; and on this model other predications may be formed in which the subject is not a substance, but is treated as if it were, and could therefore be the ground of attributes; as _Fame is treacherous, The weather is changeable_. But, in literature, sentences in which the adjective comes first are not uncommon, as _Loud was the applause, Dark is the fate of man, Blessed are the peacemakers_, and so on. Here, then, 'loud,' 'dark' and 'blessed' occupy the place of the logical subject. Are they really the subject, or must we alter the order of such sentences into _The applause was loud_, etc.? If we do, and then proceed to convert, we get _Loud was the applause_, or (more scrupulously) _Some loud noise was the applause_. The last form, it is true, gives the subject a substantive word, but 'applause' has becom
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106  
107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

subject

 

applause

 

Disjunctive

 

sentences

 
Contrapositive
 

treated

 

Sometimes

 

substantive

 
propositions
 

proposition


adjective
 
predicate
 

predications

 

formed

 

exemplary

 

Logicians

 

substance

 

Attribute

 

relation

 

central


mortal
 

Substance

 

relations

 

coinherence

 

blessed

 

occupy

 
scrupulously
 
logical
 

proceed

 
convert

peacemakers

 

weather

 
changeable
 

literature

 

treacherous

 
ground
 
attributes
 

uncommon

 

Blessed

 

Predicate


CONVERSE

 

Something

 

CONTRAPOSITIVE

 
Nothing
 

OBVERSE

 
obversion
 

conversion

 

Obverse

 

Either

 
attempt