FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130  
131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   >>   >|  
ch is equivalent, and to which it is to be reduced: as Bramantip to Barbara, Camestres to Celarent, and so forth. The vowels A, E, I, O, occurring in the several names, give the quantity and quality of major premise, minor premise, and conclusion in the usual order. The consonants s and p, occurring after a vowel, show that the proposition which the vowel stands for is to be converted either (s) simply or (p) _per accidens_; except where s or p occurs after the third vowel of a name, the conclusion: then it refers not to the conclusion of the given Mood (say Disamis), but to the conclusion of that Mood of the first Figure to which the given Mood is reduced (Darii). M (_mutare_, metathesis) means 'transpose the premises' (as of Ca_m_estres). C means 'substitute the contradictory of the conclusion for the foregoing premise,' a process of the Indirect Reduction to be presently explained (see Baroco, Sec. 8). The other consonants, r, n, t (with b and d, when not initial), occurring here and there, have no mnemonic significance. What now is the problem of Reduction? The difference of Figures depends upon the position of the Middle Term. To reduce a Mood of any other Figure to the form of the First, then, we must so manipulate its premises that the Middle Term shall be subject of the major premise and predicate of the minor premise. Now in Fig. II. the Middle Term is predicate of both premises; so that the minor premise may need no alteration, and to convert the major premise may suffice. This is the case with Cesare, which reduces to Celarent by simply converting the major premise; and with Festino, which by the same process becomes Ferio. In Camestres, however, the minor premise is negative; and, as this is impossible in Fig. I., the premises must be transposed, and the new major premise must be simply converted: then, since the transposition of the premises will have transposed the terms of the conclusion (according to the usual reading of syllogisms), the new conclusion must be simply converted in order to prove the validity of the original conclusion. The process may be thus represented (_s.c._ meaning 'simply convert') Camestres. Celarent. All P is M; ----\ /---> No M is S; \ c/ \/ s/\ / \ No S is M: ----/ \---> All P is M: s.c. .'. No S is P. <----------- No P is S. T
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130  
131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

premise

 
conclusion
 
simply
 

premises

 
Camestres
 
process
 

Celarent

 

converted

 

occurring

 

Middle


convert

 

Figure

 
predicate
 

transposed

 
Reduction
 

consonants

 

reduced

 
alteration
 

Cesare

 

reduces


suffice

 

reduce

 

manipulate

 

vowels

 

subject

 
validity
 

syllogisms

 

reading

 
original
 

equivalent


meaning

 

Bramantip

 

represented

 

transposition

 
Festino
 

negative

 

Barbara

 

impossible

 

converting

 
depends

transpose
 
metathesis
 

proposition

 

mutare

 

estres

 

foregoing

 

Indirect

 

contradictory

 
substitute
 

stands