FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117  
118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   >>   >|  
nly occurs in Barbara; see chap. x. Sec. 6), its subject and predicate are respectively the less and the greater in extent or denotation; and the premises are called after the peculiar terms they contain: the expressions 'major premise' and 'minor premise' have nothing to do with the order in which the premises are presented; though it is usual to place the major premise first. (3) No term must be distributed in the conclusion unless it is distributed in the premises. It is usual to give this as one of the General Canons of the Syllogism; but we have seen (chap. vi. Sec. 6) that it is of wider application. Indeed, 'not to go beyond the evidence' belongs to the definition of formal proof. A breech of this rule in a syllogism is the fallacy of Illicit Process of the Minor, or of the Major, according to which term has been unwarrantably distributed. The following parasyllogism illicitly distributes both terms of the conclusion: All poets are pathetic; Some orators are not poets: .'. No orators are pathetic. (4) The Middle Term must be distributed at least once in the premises (in order to prove a conclusion in the given terms). For the use of mediate evidence is to show the relation of terms that cannot be directly compared; this is only possible if the middle term furnishes the ground of comparison; and this (in Logic) requires that the whole denotation of the middle should be either included or excluded by one of the other terms; since if we only know that the other terms are related to _some_ of the middle, their respective relations may not be with the same part of it. It is true that in what has been called the "numerically definite syllogism," an inference may be drawn, though our canon seems to be violated. Thus: 60 sheep in 100 are horned; 60 sheep in 100 are blackfaced: .'. at least 20 blackfaced sheep in 100 are horned. But such an argument, though it may be correct Arithmetic, is not Logic at all; and when such numerical evidence is obtainable the comparatively indefinite arguments of Logic are needless. Another apparent exception is the following: Most men are 5 feet high; Most men are semi-rational: .'. Some semi-rational things are 5 feet high. Here the Middle Term (men) is distributed in neither premise, yet the indisputable conclusion is a logical proposition. The premises, however, are really arithmetical; for 'most' means 'more
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117  
118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

premises

 

distributed

 

conclusion

 

premise

 
evidence
 

middle

 

pathetic

 

horned

 
syllogism
 

blackfaced


Middle
 
orators
 

called

 

rational

 

denotation

 

numerically

 

definite

 

requires

 

respective

 

excluded


related
 

included

 

relations

 

numerical

 

indisputable

 

things

 
Another
 
apparent
 

exception

 
logical

proposition

 

arithmetical

 
needless
 

arguments

 

violated

 
argument
 
obtainable
 

comparatively

 

indefinite

 

correct


Arithmetic

 

inference

 

presented

 
General
 

application

 
Canons
 

Syllogism

 

expressions

 

subject

 
Barbara