FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105  
106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   >>   >|  
hich are all legitimate and (2) that although _All A is B_ does not distribute _B_ in relation to _A_, it does distribute _B_ in relation to some _not-A_ (namely, in relation to whatever _not-A_ is _not-B_). This is one reason why, in stating the rule in chap. vi. Sec. 6, I have written: "an immediate inference ought to contain nothing that is not contained, _or formally implied_, in the proposition from which it is inferred"; and have maintained that every term formally implies its contradictory within the _suppositio_. Sec. 11. Immediate Inferences from Conditionals are those which consist--(1) in changing a Disjunctive into a Hypothetical, or a Hypothetical into a Disjunctive, or either into a Categorical; and (2) in the relations of Opposition and the equivalences of Obversion, Conversion, and secondary or compound processes, which we have already examined in respect of Categoricals. As no new principles are involved, it may suffice to exhibit some of the results. We have already seen (chap. v. Sec. 4) how Disjunctives may be read as Hypotheticals and Hypotheticals as Categoricals. And, as to Opposition, if we recognise four forms of Hypothetical A. I. E. O., these plainly stand to one another in a Square of Opposition, just as Categoricals do. Thus A. and E. (_If A is B, C is D_, and _If A is B, C is not D_) are contraries, but not contradictories; since both may be false (_C_ may sometimes be _D_, and sometimes not), though they cannot both be true. And if they are both false, their subalternates are both true, being respectively the contradictories of the universals of opposite quality, namely, I. of E., and O. of A. But in the case of Disjunctives, we cannot set out a satisfactory Square of Opposition; because, as we saw (chap. v. Sec. 4), the forms required for E. and O. are not true Disjunctives, but Exponibles. The Obverse, Converse, and Contrapositive, of Hypotheticals (admitting the distinction of quality) may be exhibited thus: DATUM. OBVERSE. A. _If A is B, C is D_ _If A is B, C is not d_ I. Sometimes _when A is B, C is D_ Sometimes _when A is B, C is not d_ E. _If A is B, C is not D_ _If A is B, C is d_ O. Sometimes _when A is B, C is not D_ Sometimes _when A is B, C is d_ CONVERSE. CONTRAPOSITIVE. Sometimes _when C is D, A is B_ _If C is d, A is not B_ Sometimes _whe
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105  
106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Sometimes

 

Opposition

 

relation

 

Hypotheticals

 
Disjunctives
 

Hypothetical

 

Categoricals

 

Disjunctive

 
contradictories
 

quality


Square
 
formally
 

distribute

 

CONVERSE

 

CONTRAPOSITIVE

 

legitimate

 

contraries

 

stating

 

plainly

 

reason


subalternates
 

Obverse

 

Exponibles

 

required

 

Converse

 

Contrapositive

 
exhibited
 
distinction
 

admitting

 
OBVERSE

opposite

 

universals

 
satisfactory
 

relations

 

inferred

 
Categorical
 
maintained
 

equivalences

 

Obversion

 

processes


proposition

 

compound

 

secondary

 
Conversion
 

Immediate

 
suppositio
 

contradictory

 

Inferences

 

Conditionals

 
changing