FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78  
79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   >>   >|  
een an infinite and a negative proposition may depend upon a hyphen. It has been proposed, indeed, with a view to superficial simplification, to turn all Negatives into Infinites, and thus render all propositions Affirmative in Quality. But although every proposition both affirms and denies something according to the aspect in which you regard it (as _Snow is white_ denies that it is any other colour, and _Snow is not blue_ affirms that it is some other colour), yet there is a great difference between the definite affirmation of a genuine affirmative and the vague affirmation of a negative or infinite; so that materially an affirmative infinite is the same as a negative. Generally Mill's remark is true, that affirmation and denial stand for distinctions of fact that cannot be got rid of by manipulation of words. Whether granite sinks in water, or not; whether the rook lives a hundred years, or not; whether a man has a hundred dollars in his pocket, or not; whether human bones have ever been found in Pliocene strata, or not; such alternatives require distinct forms of expression. At the same time, it may be granted that many facts admit of being stated with nearly equal propriety in either Quality, as _No man is proof against flattery_, or _All men are open to flattery_. But whatever advantage there is in occasionally changing the Quality of a proposition may be gained by the process of Obversion (chap. vii. Sec. 5); whilst to use only one Quality would impair the elasticity of logical expression. It is a postulate of Logic that the negative sign may be transferred from the copula to the predicate, or from the predicate to the copula, without altering the sense of a proposition; and this is justified by the experience that not to have an attribute and to be without it are the same thing. Sec. 3. A. I. E. O.--Combining the two kinds of Quantity, Universal and Particular, with the two kinds of Quality, Affirmative and Negative, we get four simple types of proposition, which it is usual to symbolise by the letters A. I. E. O., thus: A. Universal Affirmative -- All S is P. I. Particular Affirmative -- Some S is P. E. Universal Negative -- No S is P. O. Particular Negative -- Some S is not P. As an aid to the remembering of these symbols we may observe that A. and I. are the first two vowels in _affirmo_ and that E. and O. are the vowels in _nego_. It must be acknowledged that these four kind
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78  
79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Quality

 

proposition

 

Affirmative

 

negative

 
Universal
 

Particular

 

Negative

 

affirmation

 
infinite
 

copula


predicate
 
vowels
 

affirmative

 

colour

 

flattery

 

affirms

 

denies

 

expression

 

hundred

 

whilst


occasionally
 

propriety

 

process

 

Obversion

 

gained

 

changing

 
advantage
 
impair
 

observe

 
symbols

remembering

 

Quantity

 
Combining
 

symbolise

 

letters

 
simple
 
affirmo
 

transferred

 

acknowledged

 

logical


postulate

 

altering

 

attribute

 
experience
 

justified

 
elasticity
 

pocket

 

aspect

 

regard

 
difference