FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511  
512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   >>   >|  
possibly be connected with Gaelic _fal_, Welsh _gwawl_, "rampart." The names of the kings in the Pictish chronicles are not an absolutely trustworthy guide, as owing to the Pictish rule of succession the bearers of the names may in many cases have been Brythons. The names of some of them occur in one source in a Goidelic, in another in a Brythonic form. It is of course possible that the southern part of Pictish territory was divided between Goidels and Brythons, the population being very much mixed. On the other hand there are a number of elements in place-names on Pictish ground which do not occur in Wales or Ireland. Such are _pet_, _pit_, "farm" (?), _for_, _fother_, _fetter_, _foder_, "lower" (?). _Aber_, "confluence," on the contrary, is pure Brythonic (Gaelic _inver_). Though the majority of scholars are of opinion that Pictish was nearly akin to the Brythonic dialects, we are entirely in the dark as to the manner in which that language was ousted by the Goidelic speech of the Dalriadic Scots. In view of the comparatively unimportant part played for a considerable period in Scottish affairs by the colony from Ireland, it is well-nigh incredible that Pictish should have been supplanted by Gaelic. AUTHORITIES.--J. Rhys, _Celtic Britain_ (London[2], 1905), _The Welsh People_ (London[3], 1902), "The Language and Inscriptions of the Northern Picts," in _Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland_ (1892); H. Zimmer, "Das Mutterrecht der Pikten," in _Savignys Zeitschrift_ (1895); also trans. by G. Henderson in _Leabhar nan Gleann_ (Inverness, 1898); W.F. Skene, _Celtic Scotland_ (Edinburgh, 1876); A. Macbain in appendix to reprint of Skene's _Highlanders of Scotland_ (Stirling, 1902); A. Macbain, "Ptolemy's Geography of Scotland," in _Transactions of the Gaelic Society of Inverness_, xviii. 267-288; W. Stokes, _Bezzenbergers Beitrage_, xviii. 267 ff.; H. d'Arbois de Jubainville, _Les Druides et les dieux celtiques a forme d'animaux_ (Paris, 1906). The various theories have been recently reviewed and criticized by T. Rice Holmes in an appendix to his _Caesar's Invasion of Britain_ (London, 1907). IV. HISTORY OF CELTIC PHILOLOGY.--For many centuries the affinities of the Celtic languages were the subject of great dispute. The languages were in turn regarded as descended from Hebrew, Teutonic and Scythian. The first attempt to treat the dialects comparatively was made by Edward Lh
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511  
512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Pictish

 

Scotland

 

Gaelic

 

Brythonic

 

Celtic

 

London

 
Britain
 
Goidelic
 

Inverness

 

dialects


Macbain

 
comparatively
 

appendix

 

Brythons

 
Ireland
 

Society

 

languages

 
Edinburgh
 

Transactions

 

Highlanders


Stirling

 

Ptolemy

 

reprint

 
Geography
 

Mutterrecht

 
Pikten
 

Northern

 

Zimmer

 

Proceedings

 

Antiquaries


Savignys

 

Zeitschrift

 

Leabhar

 

Gleann

 

Henderson

 

Stokes

 

centuries

 

affinities

 

subject

 

PHILOLOGY


CELTIC
 

HISTORY

 

dispute

 

attempt

 

Edward

 

Scythian

 

regarded

 

descended

 

Hebrew

 

Teutonic