FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210  
211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   >>   >|  
ith Aphrodite. I shall have occasion (_infra_, p. 177) to refer to M. Siret's account of the discovery of the AEgean octopus-motif upon AEneolithic objects in Spain, and of the widespread use in Western Europe of certain conventional designs derived from the octopus. M. Siret also (see the table, Fig. 6, on p. 34 of his book) makes the remarkable claim that the conventional form of the Egyptian Bes, which, according to Quibell,[309] is the god whose function it is to preside over sexual intercourse in its purely physical aspect, is derived from the octopus. If this is true--and I am bound to admit that it is far from being proved--it suggests that the Red Sea littoral may have been the place of origin of the cultural use of the octopus and an association with Hathor, for Bes and Hathor are said to have been introduced into Egypt from there.[310] That the octopus was actually identified with the Great Mother and also with the dragon is revealed by the fact of the latter assuming an octopus-form in Eastern Asia and Oceania, and by the occurrence of octopus-motifs in the representation of the goddess in America. One of the most remarkable series of pictures depicting the Great Mother is found sculptured in low relief upon a number of stone slabs from Manabi in Central America,[311] one of which I reproduce here (Fig. 21_b_). The head of the goddess is a conventionalized octopus; to that was added a body consisting of a _Loligo_; and, to give greater definiteness to this remarkable process of building up the form of the goddess, conventional representations of her arms and legs (and in some of the sculptures also the _pudendum muliebre_) were added. Thus there can be no doubt of the identification of this American Aphrodite and the octopus. In the Polynesian Rata-myth there is a very instructive series of manifestations of the dragon.[312] The first form assumed by the monster in this story was a gaping shell-fish of enormous size; then it appeared as a mighty octopus; and lastly, as a whale, into whose jaws the hero Nganaoa sprang, as his representatives are said to have done elsewhere throughout the world (Frobenius, _op. cit._, pp. 59-219). Houssay (_op. cit. infra_) calls attention to the fact that at times Astarte was shown carrying an octopus as her emblem,[313] and has suggested that it was mistaken for a hand, just as in America the thunderbolt of Chac was given a hand-like form in the Dresden Codex (_vide
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210  
211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
octopus
 

conventional

 

America

 
remarkable
 
goddess
 
dragon
 

Mother

 

Aphrodite

 

series

 

derived


Hathor
 
Polynesian
 

identification

 

conventionalized

 

American

 

Loligo

 

greater

 

representations

 

process

 

building


definiteness
 

muliebre

 

sculptures

 
pudendum
 

consisting

 
lastly
 
Astarte
 

carrying

 

attention

 

Houssay


emblem

 

Dresden

 
thunderbolt
 
suggested
 

mistaken

 
Frobenius
 

gaping

 

enormous

 

monster

 

manifestations


assumed

 

appeared

 
representatives
 

sprang

 
Nganaoa
 
mighty
 

instructive

 

Oceania

 
function
 

preside