FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202   1203   1204   1205   1206   1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217   1218   1219   1220  
1221   1222   1223   1224   1225   1226   1227   1228   1229   1230   1231   1232   1233   1234   1235   1236   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242   1243   1244   1245   >>   >|  
3: The voluntary, in cowardice, depends rather on a general than on a particular consideration: wherefore in such cases we have the voluntary not simply but in a restricted sense. _______________________ FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 142, Art. 4] Whether Intemperance Is the Most Disgraceful of Sins? Objection 1: It would seem that intemperance is not the most disgraceful of sins. As honor is due to virtue so is disgrace due to sin. Now some sins are more grievous than intemperance: for instance murder, blasphemy, and the like. Therefore intemperance is not the most disgraceful of sins. Obj. 2: Further, those sins which are the more common are seemingly less disgraceful, since men are less ashamed of them. Now sins of intemperance are most common, because they are about things connected with the common use of human life, and in which many happen to sin. Therefore sins of intemperance do not seem to be most disgraceful. Obj. 3: Further, the Philosopher says (Ethic. vii, 6) temperance and intemperance are about human desires and pleasures. Now certain desires and pleasures are more shameful than human desires and pleasures; such are brutal pleasures and those caused by disease as the Philosopher states (Ethic. vii, 5). Therefore intemperance is not the most disgraceful of sins. _On the contrary,_ The Philosopher says (Ethic. iii, 10) that "intemperance is justly more deserving of reproach than other vices." _I answer that,_ Disgrace is seemingly opposed to honor and glory. Now honor is due to excellence, as stated above (Q. 103, A. 1), and glory denotes clarity (Q. 103, A. 1, ad 3). Accordingly intemperance is most disgraceful for two reasons. First, because it is most repugnant to human excellence, since it is about pleasures common to us and the lower animals, as stated above (Q. 141, AA. 2, 3). Wherefore it is written (Ps. 48:21): "Man, when he was in honor, did not understand: he hath been compared to senseless beasts, and made like to them." Secondly, because it is most repugnant to man's clarity or beauty; inasmuch as the pleasures which are the matter of intemperance dim the light of reason from which all the clarity and beauty of virtue arises: wherefore these pleasures are described as being most slavish. Reply Obj. 1: As Gregory says [*Moral. xxxiii. 12] "the sins of the flesh," which are comprised under the head of intemperance, although less culpable, are more disgraceful. The reason is that culp
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1196   1197   1198   1199   1200   1201   1202   1203   1204   1205   1206   1207   1208   1209   1210   1211   1212   1213   1214   1215   1216   1217   1218   1219   1220  
1221   1222   1223   1224   1225   1226   1227   1228   1229   1230   1231   1232   1233   1234   1235   1236   1237   1238   1239   1240   1241   1242   1243   1244   1245   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

intemperance

 

pleasures

 

disgraceful

 

common

 

Therefore

 

clarity

 
desires
 

Philosopher

 
stated
 

excellence


repugnant

 
Further
 
seemingly
 
beauty
 

voluntary

 
reason
 

wherefore

 
virtue
 

Gregory

 

Wherefore


xxxiii
 

animals

 

reasons

 

culpable

 

opposed

 

denotes

 

written

 

Accordingly

 
comprised
 

slavish


matter

 

compared

 

Disgrace

 

beasts

 

senseless

 

Secondly

 

arises

 

understand

 
Disgraceful
 
Intemperance

Whether
 

Objection

 
grievous
 
instance
 

disgrace

 
consideration
 

general

 

cowardice

 

depends

 
FOURTH