[Footnote 352: Jan. 25, 1833.]
[Footnote 353: Feb. 5, 1833.]
[Footnote 354: March 25, 1833.]
[Footnote 355: _Naturphilosophie_, p. 115; _Einleitung in die
Philosophie_, pp. 40, 54; _Freiheit der Wissenschaft_, pp. 4, 89;
_Athenaeum_, i. 17.]
[Footnote 356: _Athenaeum_, i. 92.]
[Footnote 357: _Freiheit der Wissenschaft_, p. 32.]
[Footnote 358: _Athenaeum_, i. 167.]
[Footnote 359: _Einleitung_, pp. 305, 317, 397.]
[Footnote 360: _Athenaeum_, i. 208.]
[Footnote 361: _Ibid._ ii. 655.]
[Footnote 362: _Ibid._ ii. 676.]
[Footnote 363: _Ibid._ ii. 661.]
[Footnote 364: _Wiedervereinigung der Katholiken und Protestanten_, pp.
26, 35.]
[Footnote 365: _Wiedervereinigung_, pp. 8, 10.]
[Footnote 366: _Ibid._ p. 15.]
[Footnote 367: _Ibid._ p. 21.]
[Footnote 368: _Ibid._ pp. 25, 26.]
[Footnote 369: The prospectus of the _Review_ contained these words: "It
will abstain from direct theological discussion, as far as external
circumstances will allow; and in dealing with those mixed questions into
which theology indirectly enters, its aim will be to combine devotion to
the Church with discrimination and candour in the treatment of her
opponents: to reconcile freedom of inquiry with implicit faith, and to
discountenance what is untenable and unreal, without forgetting the
tenderness due to the weak, or the reverence rightly claimed for what is
sacred. Submitting without reserve to infallible authority, it will
encourage a habit of manly investigation on subjects of scientific
interest."]
XIV
THE VATICAN COUNCIL[370]
The intention of Pius IX. to convene a General Council became known in
the autumn of 1864, shortly before the appearance of the Syllabus. They
were the two principal measures which were designed to restore the
spiritual and temporal power of the Holy See. When the idea of the
Council was first put forward it met with no favour. The French bishops
discouraged it; and the French bishops holding the talisman of the
occupying army, spoke with authority. Later on, when the position had
been altered by the impulse which the Syllabus gave to the ultramontane
opinions, they revived the scheme they had first opposed. Those who felt
their influence injured by the change persuaded themselves that the
Court of Rome was more prudent than some of its partisans, and that the
Episcopate was less given to extremes than the priesthood and laity.
They conceived the hope that an assembly of bi
|