FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122  
123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   >>   >|  
o reach. Rossetti belongs to the ornamental school of poetry. He writes more like a man who has gone into a library than like one who has gone out to Nature, and ornamentalism in poetry is simply the result of seeing life, not directly, but through the coloured glass of literature and the other arts. Rossetti was the forerunner of all those artists and authors of recent times, who, in greater or less degree, looked on art as a weaving of patterns, an arrangement of wonderful words and sounds and colours. Pater in his early writings, William Morris, Oscar Wilde, and all those others who dreamed that it was the artist's province to enrich the world with beautiful furniture--for conduct itself seemed, in the philosophy of these writers, to aspire after the quality of tapestry--are implicit in _The Blessed Damozel_ and _Troy Town._ It is not that Rossetti could command words like Pater or Wilde. His phrasing, if personal, is curiously empty of the graces. He often does achieve graces of phrase; but some of his most haunting poems owe their power over us to their general pattern, and not to any persistent fine workmanship. How beautiful _Troy Town_ is, for instance, and yet how lacking in beautiful verses! The poet was easily content in his choice of words who could leave a verse like:-- Venus looked on Helen's gift; _(O Troy Town!)_ Looked and smiled with subtle drift, Saw the work of her heart's desire:-- "There thou kneel'st for Love to lift!" _(O Troy's down, Tall Troy's on fire!)_ Rossetti never wrote; a poem that was fine throughout. There is nothing to correspond to _The Skylark_ or the _Ode to a Grecian Urn_ or _Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came_ in his work. The truth is, he was not a great poet, because he was not a singer. He was capable of decorations in verse, but he was not capable of song. His sonnets, it may be argued, are more than decorations. But even they are laden with beauty; they are never, as it were, light and alight with it, as are _Shall I compare thee to a summer's day?_ and _Where lies the land to which yon ship must go?_ They have flagging pulses like desire itself, and are often weary before the fourteenth line. Only rarely do we get a last six lines like:-- O love, my love! if I no more should see Thyself, nor on the earth the shadow of thee, Nor image of thine eyes in any spring,-- How then should sound upon L
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122  
123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Rossetti

 
beautiful
 

decorations

 
capable
 

desire

 

graces

 
looked
 

poetry

 

singer

 

writes


beauty

 
alight
 

school

 

argued

 

sonnets

 

Roland

 

Grecian

 
Childe
 

Skylark

 

correspond


compare

 

Thyself

 

spring

 

shadow

 

belongs

 
summer
 
fourteenth
 

rarely

 
flagging
 

pulses


ornamental
 

philosophy

 

writers

 

aspire

 
furniture
 

forerunner

 

conduct

 

quality

 
coloured
 

Damozel


Blessed

 
tapestry
 

implicit

 

literature

 

enrich

 
province
 

sounds

 
colours
 

greater

 

degree