an international Prize Court of
Appeal infringe the sovereignty of the several states? 44
56. The powers of the International Prize Court do not curtail
state-sovereignty 45
57. Difference between international courts of arbitration and
real international courts of justice 46
58. Fundamentals of arbitration in contradistinction to
administration of justice by a court 47
59. Opposition to a real international court 48
60. A real international court does not endanger the
peaceable settlement of disputes 49
61. Composition of an international court 50
62. International courts of appeal a necessity 51
63. Are international courts valueless if states are not bound
to submit their disputes to them? 52
64. What is to be done if a state refuses to accept the
decision of an international court? 54
65. Executive power not necessary for an international court 54
66. Right of intervention by third states and war as _ultima
ratio_ 55

CHAPTER IV

THE SCIENCE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW

67. New tasks for the science of international law 56
68. The science of international law must become positive 56
69. The science of international law must be impartial 58
70. The science of international law must free itself from the
tyranny of phrases 58
71. The meaning of '_Kriegsraeson geht vor Kriegsmanier_' 59
72. The doctrine of Rousseau concerning war 60
73. The science of international law must become
international 63
74. Necessary to consult foreign literature on
international law 63
75. Necessary to understand foreign juristic methods 64

CONCLUSION

76. The aims defended are not Utopian 66
77. Obstacles to progress 67

INTRODUCTION

[Sidenote: International law in the past.]

1. He who would portray the future of international law