FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111  
112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   >>   >|  
_, vol ii. p. 110. Camb. 1757.] [Footnote 74: It should be stated that prior to the publication of the work in a book form the greater part of the eclipse observations had been published in the _Memoires de l'Institut National des Sciences et Arts: Sciences Mathematiques et Physiques_, tome ii.] [Footnote 75: Letter in the _Times_, July 19, 1872.] [Footnote 76: J. F. J. Schmidt, _Ast. Nach._, vol. lxxvii. p. 127, Feb. 1, 1871.] [Footnote 77: _Memoirs_, R.A.S., vol. xxvi. p. 131, 1858.] [Footnote 78: J. L. E. Dreyer, _Nature_, vol. xvi. p. 549, Oct. 25, 1877.] CHAPTER XII. ECLIPSES OF THE SUN MENTIONED IN HISTORY.-- MEDIAEVAL AND MODERN. One of the most celebrated eclipses of mediaeval times was that of August 2, 1133, visible as a total eclipse in Scotland. It was considered a presage of misfortune to Henry I. and was thus referred to by William of Malmesbury[80]:-- "The elements manifested their sorrow at this great man's last departure from England. For the Sun on that day at the 6th hour shrouded his glorious face, as the poets say, in hideous darkness agitating the hearts of men by an eclipse; and on the 6th day of the week early in the morning there was so great an earthquake that the ground appeared absolutely to sink down; an horrid noise being first heard beneath the surface." This eclipse is also alluded to in the _Anglo-Saxon Chronicle_ though the year is wrongly given as 1135 instead of 1133 as it certainly was. The _Chronicle_ says:--"In this year King Henry went over sea at Lammas, and the second day as he lay and slept on the ship the day darkened over all lands; and the Sun became as it were a three-night-old Moon, and the stars about it at mid-day. Men were greatly wonder-stricken and affrighted, and said that a great thing should come hereafter. So it did, for the same year the king died on the following day after St. Andrew's Mass day, Dec. 2, in Normandy." The king did die in 1135, but there was no eclipse of the August new Moon, and without doubt the writer has muddled up the year of the eclipse and of the king's departure from England (to which he never returned) and the year of his death. Calvisius states that this eclipse was observed in Flanders and that the stars appeared. Respecting the above-mentioned discrepancy Mrs. Todd aptly remarks:--"So Henry m
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111  
112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
eclipse
 

Footnote

 

Chronicle

 

August

 

appeared

 

departure

 
England
 
Sciences
 
wrongly
 

ground


absolutely

 

earthquake

 

morning

 
horrid
 

alluded

 

surface

 

beneath

 

writer

 

muddled

 

Normandy


returned

 

discrepancy

 

remarks

 

mentioned

 
states
 

Calvisius

 

observed

 

Flanders

 
Respecting
 

Andrew


darkened

 

greatly

 
stricken
 

affrighted

 
Lammas
 

Schmidt

 

lxxvii

 

Letter

 
Memoirs
 

Physiques


publication
 
greater
 

stated

 

observations

 

National

 

Institut

 
Mathematiques
 

published

 

Memoires

 

Dreyer