FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112  
113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>   >|  
ust have died in 1133, which he _did not_; or else there must have been an eclipse in 1135, which there _was not_. But this is not the only labyrinth into which chronology and old eclipses, imagination, and computation, lead the unwary searcher." Professor Freeman's explanation fairly clears up the difficulty:--"The fact that he never came back to England, together with the circumstances of his voyage, seems to have made a deep impression on men's minds. In popular belief the signs and wonders which marked his last voyage were transferred to the Lammas-tide before his death two years later."[81] The central line of this eclipse traversed Scotland from Ross to Forfar and the eclipse was of course large in every part of the country. The totality lasted 4m. 20s. in Forfarshire. Hind has furnished some further information respecting this eclipse. It appears that during the existence of the Kingdom of Jerusalem created by the Crusaders an eclipse occurred which would appear to have been total at Jerusalem or in its immediate neighbourhood. No date is given and a date can only be guessed, and Hind guessed that the eclipse of 1133 was the one referred to. He found that after leaving Scotland and crossing Europe the central line of the 1133 eclipse entered Palestine near Jaffa and passed over Jerusalem where the Sun was hidden for 41/4 minutes at about 3h. p.m. From Nablous on the N. to Ascalon on the S. the country was in darkness for nearly the same period of time. The alternative eclipses to this one would be those of Sept. 4, 1187, magnitude at Jerusalem 9/10ths of the Sun's diameter; or June 23, 1191, magnitude at the same place about 7/10ths; but these do not seem to harmonise so well with the accounts handed down to us as does the eclipse of 1133. In 1140, on March 20, there happened a total eclipse of the Sun visible in England which is thus referred to by William of Malmesbury[82]:-- "During this year, in Lent, on the 13th of the Calends of April, at the 9th hour of the 4th day of the week, there was an eclipse, throughout England, as I have heard. With us, indeed, and with all our neighbours, the obscuration of the Sun also was so remarkable, that persons sitting at table, as it then happened almost everywhere, for it was Lent, at first feared that Chaos was come again: afterwards, learning the cause, they went out and beheld the stars around the Sun. It was thought and said by many, not untruly, that the King [Step
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112  
113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
eclipse
 

Jerusalem

 

England

 

voyage

 

magnitude

 

Scotland

 
happened
 

central

 

referred

 

guessed


country

 

eclipses

 

harmonise

 

Ascalon

 
handed
 

accounts

 

period

 

Nablous

 

darkness

 

minutes


alternative
 

diameter

 

feared

 
sitting
 
persons
 

learning

 

untruly

 

thought

 

beheld

 

remarkable


During

 

Calends

 

Malmesbury

 

William

 

visible

 

neighbours

 

obscuration

 
impression
 

popular

 

circumstances


belief

 

Lammas

 
transferred
 
wonders
 

marked

 

labyrinth

 
chronology
 

imagination

 
computation
 

fairly