FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99  
100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   >>   >|  
t unreasonable to bring this chapter to a close by giving the views of an eminent American astronomer as to the objections to placing too much reliance on ancient accounts of eclipses. Says Prof. S. Newcomb[60]:--"The first difficulty is to be reasonably sure that a total eclipse was really the phenomenon observed. Many of the statements supposed to refer to total eclipses are so vague that they may be referred to other less rare phenomena. It must never be forgotten that we are dealing with an age when accurate observations and descriptions of natural phenomena were unknown, and when mankind was subject to be imposed upon by imaginary wonders and prodigies. The circumstance which we should regard as most unequivocally marking a total eclipse is the visibility of the stars during the darkness. But even this can scarcely be regarded as conclusive, because Venus may be seen when there is no eclipse, and may be quite conspicuous in an annular or a considerable partial eclipse. The exaggeration of a single object into a plural is in general very easy. Another difficulty is to be sure of the locality where the eclipse was total. It is commonly assumed that the description necessarily refers to something seen where the writer flourished, or where he locates his story. It seems to me that this cannot be safely done unless the statement is made in connection with some battle or military movement, in which case we may presume the phenomena to have been seen by the army." FOOTNOTES: [Footnote 36: _De Republica_, Lib. vi., cap. 22.] [Footnote 37: E. Millosevich, _Memorie della Societa Spettroscopisti Italiani_, vol. xxii. p. 70. 1893.] [Footnote 38: _Herodotus_, Book i., chap. 74. This eclipse is also mentioned by Pliny (_Nat. Hist._, Book ii., chap. 9) and by Cicero (_De Divinatione_, cap. 49).] [Footnote 39: _Astronomy of the Ancients_, p. 88.] [Footnote 40: _Herodotus_, edited by Rev. G. Rawlinson, vol. i. p. 212.] [Footnote 41: _Month. Not._, R.A.S., vol. xviii. p. 148; March 1858.] [Footnote 42: _Anabasis_, Lib. iii., cap. 4, sec. 7.] [Footnote 43: _Washington Observations_, 1875, Appendix II., p. 31.] [Footnote 44: Book vii., chap. 37. See Rawlinson's _Herodotus_, vol. iv. p. 39.] [Footnote 45: _Scholia, in Aristidis Orationes_, Ed. Frommel, p. 222.] [Footnote 46: Book ix., chap. 10. See Rawlinson's _Herodotus_, 3rd ed
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99  
100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

eclipse

 

Herodotus

 

phenomena

 

Rawlinson

 

eclipses

 
difficulty
 
Millosevich
 
Memorie
 

Orationes


Frommel

 

Italiani

 

Scholia

 
Spettroscopisti
 

Aristidis

 

Societa

 

connection

 

battle

 

military

 

movement


statement

 

safely

 

presume

 

Republica

 
FOOTNOTES
 

Observations

 

Appendix

 

Anabasis

 
Washington
 

Cicero


mentioned

 

Divinatione

 
edited
 

Astronomy

 
Ancients
 

referred

 

observed

 

statements

 
supposed
 

natural


unknown
 
mankind
 

subject

 

descriptions

 

observations

 

forgotten

 
dealing
 

accurate

 

phenomenon

 

eminent