FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253  
254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   >>   >|  
of crowns or other honours voted by the assembly to its officers. This assembly, in accordance with the law, elected its officers once a year, and these, like those of the state itself, took an oath on entering office, and gave an account of their stewardship at the end of the year. Further details on these points of internal government will be found in Foucart's work (pp. 20 foll.), chiefly derived from inscriptions of the orgeones engaged in the cult of the Mother of the Gods at the Peiraeus. The important question whether these religious associations were in any sense benefit clubs, or relieved the sick and needy, is answered by him emphatically in the negative. As might naturally be supposed, the religious clubs increased rather than diminished in number and importance in the later periods of Greek history, and a large proportion of the inscriptions relating to them belong to the Macedonian and Roman empires. One of the most interesting, found in 1868, belongs to the 2nd century A.D., viz. that which reveals the worship of M[=e]n Tyrannos at Laurium (Foucart, pp. 119 foll.). This Phrygian deity was introduced into Attica by a Lycian slave, employed by a Roman in working the mines at Laurium. He founded the cult and the _eranos_ which was to maintain it, and seems also to have drawn up the law regulating its ritual and government. This may help us to understand the way in which similar associations of an earlier age were instituted. _Roman._--At Rome the principle of private association was recognized very early by the state; _sodalitates_ for religious purposes are mentioned in the XII. Tables (Gaius in _Digest_, 47. 22. 4), and _collegia opificum_, or trade gilds, were believed to have been instituted by Numa, which probably means that they were regulated by the _jus divinum_ as being associated with particular worships. It is difficult to distinguish between the two words _collegium_ and _sodalitas_; but _collegium_ is the wider of the two in meaning, and may be used for associations of all kinds, public and private, while _sodalitas_ is more especially a union for the purpose of maintaining a cult. Both words indicate the permanence of the object undertaken by the association, while a _societas_ is a temporary combination without strictly permanent duties. With the _societates publicanorum_ and other contracting bodies of which money-making was the main object, we are not here concerned. The _collegia opif
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253  
254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

religious

 

associations

 

private

 

association

 
Foucart
 

inscriptions

 

assembly

 

sodalitas

 
collegium
 

officers


object
 
government
 

collegia

 

instituted

 

Laurium

 

Tables

 

believed

 

opificum

 

mentioned

 

concerned


Digest
 

recognized

 

understand

 

ritual

 

regulating

 

similar

 
sodalitates
 
principle
 

earlier

 
purposes

distinguish

 

societas

 
undertaken
 

temporary

 

combination

 
permanence
 
purpose
 

maintaining

 

strictly

 

bodies


making

 

contracting

 

publicanorum

 
permanent
 

duties

 
societates
 

worships

 

regulated

 

divinum

 
difficult