FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46  
47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   >>  
ry yong children."--_Golden Boke_, c. ix. * * * * * Replies. BISHOP KEN. (Vol. vii., p. 526.) By converting a noun into a surname, Dodsley has led J. J. J. into a natural, but somewhat amusing mistake. The lines quoted are in Horace Walpole's well-known epistle, from Florence, addressed to his college friend T[homas] A[shton,] tutor of the Earl of P[lymouth]. In Walpole's _Fugitive Pieces_, printed at Strawberry Hill, 1758 (the copy of which, now before me, was given by Walpole to Cole in 1762, and contains several notes by the latter), the passage stands correctly thus: "Or, with wise ken, judiciously define, When Pius marks the honorary coin, Of Carnealla, or of Antonine." Your correspondent refers to an edition of the _Collection of Poems_ of 1758. In a much later edition of that work, viz. 1782, the line is again printed-- "Or with wise KEN," &c. It is strange that the mistake was not corrected, at the instance of Walpole himself, during this long interval. Turning to Bishop Ken, I would observe that in his excellent Life of this prelate, Mr. Anderdon has given the three well-known hymns "word for word," as first penned. These, Mr. A. tells us, are found, for the first time, in a copy of the _Manual of Prayers For the Use of the Winchester Scholars_, printed in 1700. The bishop's versions vary so very materially from those to which we have been accustomed from childhood, that these original copies are very interesting. Indeed, within five years after their first appearance, and during the author's life, material changes were made, several of which are retained to the present hour. It must be admitted that some of the stanzas, as they first came from the bishop's pen, are singularly rugged and inharmonious, almost justifying the request made by the lady to Byrom (as I have stated elsewhere[1]), "to revise and polish the bishop's poems." How came these hymns, so far the most popular of his poetical works, to be omitted by Hawkins in the collected edition of the poems, printed in 4 vols., 1721? My present object is, to call your attention to a "Midnight Hymn," by Sir Thomas Browne, which will be found in his works (vol. ii. p. 113., edit. Wilkin). Can there be question that to it Ken is indebted for some of the thoughts and expressions in two of his own hymns? The good bishop's fame will not be lessened by his adopting what was good in the works
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46  
47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   >>  



Top keywords:

printed

 

Walpole

 

bishop

 

edition

 

mistake

 

present

 
retained
 

admitted

 

author

 
material

original

 

materially

 

versions

 

Winchester

 
Scholars
 

accustomed

 
childhood
 

copies

 

interesting

 

Indeed


appearance
 

polish

 

Browne

 

Thomas

 

attention

 
Midnight
 

Wilkin

 

lessened

 

adopting

 

expressions


question

 

indebted

 

thoughts

 

object

 

request

 
stated
 

justifying

 
singularly
 

rugged

 

inharmonious


revise

 
collected
 

Hawkins

 

omitted

 

poetical

 

popular

 
stanzas
 

interval

 
lymouth
 
Florence