FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438  
439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   >>   >|  
breakfast. _Oxford and Cambridge._--Curious how, like two buckets, whenever one was up, the other was down. Cambridge has never produced four such men of action in successive ages as Wolsey, Laud, Wesley, and Newman. _J. M._--In the region of thought Cambridge has produced the greatest of all names, Newton. _Mr. G._--In the earlier times Oxford has it--with Wycliff, Occam, above all Roger Bacon. And then in the eighteenth century, Butler. _J. M._--But why not Locke, too, in the century before? This brought on a tremendous tussle, for Mr. G. was of the same mind, and perhaps for the same sort of reason, as Joseph de Maistre, that contempt for Locke is the beginning of knowledge. All very well for De Maistre, but not for a man in line with European liberalism. I pressed the very obvious point that you must take into account not only a man's intellectual product or his general stature, but also (M169) his influence as a historic force. From the point of view of influence Locke was the origin of the emancipatory movement of the eighteenth century abroad, and laid the philosophic foundations of liberalism in civil government at home. Mr. G. insisted on a passage of Hume's which he believed to be in the history, disparaging Locke as a metaphysical thinker.(292) "That may be," said I, "though Hume in his _Essays_ is not above paying many compliments to 'the great reasoner,' etc., to whom, for that matter, I fancy that he stood in pretty direct relation. But far be it from me to deny that Hume saw deeper than Locke into the metaphysical millstone. That is not the point. I'm only thinking of his historic place, and, after all, the history of philosophy is itself a philosophy." To minds nursed in dogmatic schools, all this is both unpalatable and incredible. Somehow we slid into the freedom of the will and Jonathan Edwards. I told him that Mill had often told us how Edwards argued the necessarian or determinist case as keenly as any modern. _Tuesday, Dec. 29._--Mr. G. 82 to-day. I gave him Mackail's Greek Epigrams, and if it affords him half as much pleasure as it has given me, he will be very grateful. Various people brought Mr. G. bouquets and addresses. Mr. G. went to church in the morning, and in the afternoon took a walk with me.... _Land Question._ As you go through France you see the soil cultivated by the population. In our little dash into Spain the other day, we saw again the soil cultivated by the populati
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438  
439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

century

 

Cambridge

 

Maistre

 
eighteenth
 
philosophy
 

Oxford

 
brought
 

Edwards

 

history

 

influence


historic
 

metaphysical

 

cultivated

 

liberalism

 

produced

 
Somehow
 

freedom

 

incredible

 

unpalatable

 
thinking

relation

 
deeper
 

direct

 

pretty

 

matter

 

millstone

 

nursed

 
dogmatic
 

schools

 

Jonathan


Tuesday

 

afternoon

 

morning

 

church

 

Various

 

people

 

bouquets

 

addresses

 

Question

 

populati


population

 

France

 

grateful

 

keenly

 

modern

 

reasoner

 
determinist
 

necessarian

 

argued

 

affords