FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364  
365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   >>   >|  
e results of the miscegenation of these stocks during the colonial period. [12] Code Noir, 1724. [13] Code Noir. [14] Lebeau, De la condition des gens de couleur libres sous l'ancien regime, p. 49. [15] Ibid., 49. [16] Ibid., 50. [17] Ibid., 51. [18] In the treaty of 1803 between the newly acquired territory of Louisiana and the government of the United States, they and all mixed bloods were granted full citizenship. [19] Most writers of our day adhere to this definition. See Grace King, "New Orleans, etc.," and Gayarre, "History of Louisiana." [20] Lebeau, De la condition des gens de couleur libres sous l'ancien regime, passim. [21] Ibid., 60. [22] Laws of Jamaica. [23] Litigation on the subject of the definition of the free person of color reached its climax in the year of our Lord, 1909, when Judge Frank D. Chretien defined the word Negro as differentiated from person of color as used in Louisiana. The case, as it was argued in court, was briefly this. It was charged that one Treadway, a white man, was living in illegal relations with an octoroon, Josephine Lightell. The District Attorney claimed that any one having a trace of African blood in his veins, however slight, should be classed as a Negro. Counsel for the defence had taken the position that Josephine Lightell had so little Negro blood in her veins that she could not be classed as one. Judge Chretien held in his ruling that local opinion, custom and sentiment had previously agreed in holding that the black, and not the white blood settled the ethnological status of each person and that an octoroon, no less than a quadroon and a mulatto, had been considered a Negro. But he held that if the Caucasian wished to be considered the superior race, and that if his blood be considered the superior element in the infusion, then the Caucasian and not the Negro blood must determine the status of a person. The case went to the Supreme Court of Louisiana on an appeal from the decision of Judge Chretien who held that a mulatto is not a Negro in legal parlance. The Supreme Court in a decision handed down April 25, 1910, sustained the view of Judge Chretien. This decision was an interpretation of an act of 1908 which set forth a definition of the word Negro.--See State vs. Treadway, 126 Louisiana, 300. [24] Gayarre, "History of Louisiana," I, 444, 448. [25] Ibid., I, 365, 442, 454. [26] Ibid., I, 448. [27] Gayarre, "History of Louisiana
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364  
365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Louisiana

 

Chretien

 
person
 

definition

 

considered

 
History
 
Gayarre
 
decision
 

superior

 

Caucasian


Supreme
 

mulatto

 

Josephine

 
octoroon
 
Lightell
 
classed
 
status
 

Treadway

 

condition

 
couleur

regime

 

ancien

 

libres

 

Lebeau

 

slight

 
opinion
 

ruling

 

Counsel

 

defence

 

custom


position

 

previously

 
element
 

sustained

 

wished

 

handed

 

infusion

 
appeal
 

parlance

 

determine


interpretation

 

ethnological

 

settled

 

agreed

 

holding

 
quadroon
 
sentiment
 

argued

 

States

 

United