FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268  
269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   >>   >|  
ula is certainly erroneous at low temperatures. A favourite temperature to select is 4 deg. C., the temperature of maximum density, since at this point the specific heat at constant volume is the same as that at constant pressure But this is really of no consequence, since the specific heat at constant volume cannot be practically realized. The specific heat at 4 deg. could be accurately determined at the mean over the range 0 deg. to 8 deg. keeping the jacket at 0 deg. C. But the change appears to be rather rapid near 0 deg., the temperature is inconveniently low for ordinary calorimetric work, and the unit at 4 deg. would be so much larger than the specific heat at ordinary temperatures that nearly all experiments would require reduction. The natural point to select would be that of minimum specific heat, but if this occurs at 40 deg. C. it would be inconveniently high for practical realization except by the continuous electrical method. It was proposed by a committee of the British Association to select the temperature at which the specific heat was 4.200 joules, leaving the exact temperature to be subsequently determined. It was supposed at the time, from the original reduction of Rowland's experiments, that this would be nearly at 10 deg. C., but it now appears that it may be as low is 5 deg. C., which would be inconvenient. This is really only an absolute unit in disguise, and evades the essential point, which is the selection of a standard temperature for the water thermometric unit. A similar objection applies to selecting the temperature at which the specific heat is equal to its mean value between 0 deg. and 100 deg. The mean calorie cannot be accurately realized in practice in any simple manner, and is therefore unsuitable as a standard of comparison. Its relation to the calorie at any given temperature, such as 15 deg. or 20 deg., cannot be determined with the same degree of accuracy as the ratio of the specific heat at 15 deg. to that at 20 deg., if the scale of temperature is given. The most practical unit is the calorie at 15 deg. or 20 deg. or some temperature in the range of ordinary practice. The temperature most generally favoured is 15 deg., but 20 deg. would be more suitable for accurate work. These units differ only by 11 parts in 10,000 according to Callendar and Barnes, or by 13 in 10,000 according to Rowland and Griffiths, so th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268  
269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

temperature

 

specific

 

determined

 

ordinary

 
select
 
constant
 

calorie

 

standard

 

temperatures

 

practice


Rowland

 
reduction
 

practical

 

experiments

 
accurately
 

inconveniently

 
appears
 
volume
 
realized
 

applies


selection

 

essential

 
evades
 

disguise

 

thermometric

 
similar
 

selecting

 

simple

 
objection
 
favoured

degree
 

suitable

 
accuracy
 
Barnes
 

generally

 

accurate

 

Callendar

 

comparison

 
Griffiths
 

unsuitable


manner

 
relation
 

differ

 

continuous

 

calorimetric

 

jacket

 

change

 

larger

 

natural

 

minimum