FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1417   1418   1419   1420   1421   1422   1423   1424   1425   1426   1427   1428   1429   1430   1431   1432   1433   1434   1435   1436   1437   1438   1439   1440   1441  
1442   1443   1444   1445   1446   1447   1448   1449   1450   1451   1452   1453   1454   1455   1456   1457   1458   1459   1460   1461   1462   1463   1464   1465   1466   >>   >|  
Of two prepositions coming together between the same terms of relation, and sometimes connected in the same construction, I have given several plain examples in this chapter, and in the tenth chapter of Etymology, a very great number, all from sources sufficiently respectable. But, in many of our English grammars, there is a stereotyped remark on this point, originally written by Priestley, which it is proper here to cite, as an other specimen of the Doctor's hastiness, and of the blind confidence of certain compilers and copyists: "Two different prepositions _must be improper_ in the same construction, and in the same sentence: [as,] _The combat_ between _thirty Britons_, against _twenty English_. Smollett's Voltaire, Vol. 2, p. 292."--_Priestley's Gram._, p. 156. Lindley Murray and others have the same remark, with the example altered thus: "The combat _between_ thirty _French against_ twenty English."--_Murray's Gram._, 8vo, p. 200; _Smith's New Gram._, 167: _Fisk's_, 142; _Ingersoll's_, 228. W. Allen has it thus: "Two different prepositions in the _same construction_ are improper; as, a combat _between twenty_ French _against thirty_ English."--_Elements of E. Gram._, p. 179. He gives the odds to the latter party. Hiley, with no expense of thought, first takes from Murray, as he from Priestley, the useless remark, "Different relations, and different senses, must be expressed by different prepositions;" and then adds, "_One relation_ must not, _therefore_, be expressed by two different prepositions in the same clause; thus, 'The combat _between thirty_ French _against thirty_ English,' should be, 'The combat _between thirty_ French _and thirty_ English.'"--_Hiley's E. Gram._, p 97. It is manifest that the error of this example is not in the use of _two prepositions_, nor is there any truth or fitness in the note or notes made on it by all these critics; for had they said, "The combat _of_ thirty French _against_ twenty English," there would still be two prepositions, but where would be the impropriety, or where the sameness of construction, which they speak of? _Between_ is incompatible with _against_, only because it requires two parties or things for its own regimen; as, "The combat _between_ thirty _Frenchmen and_ twenty _Englishmen_." This is what Smollett should have written, to make sense with the word "_between_." OBS. 15.--With like implicitness, Hiley excepted, these grammarians and others have adopted from L
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1417   1418   1419   1420   1421   1422   1423   1424   1425   1426   1427   1428   1429   1430   1431   1432   1433   1434   1435   1436   1437   1438   1439   1440   1441  
1442   1443   1444   1445   1446   1447   1448   1449   1450   1451   1452   1453   1454   1455   1456   1457   1458   1459   1460   1461   1462   1463   1464   1465   1466   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
thirty
 

combat

 
prepositions
 
English
 

French

 

twenty

 

construction

 

Murray

 

remark

 
Priestley

written

 

chapter

 
improper
 
expressed
 
Smollett
 

relation

 
Different
 
relations
 

senses

 

useless


thought

 

fitness

 

manifest

 

clause

 

regimen

 
Frenchmen
 
Englishmen
 

grammarians

 

adopted

 

excepted


implicitness
 
expense
 

impropriety

 

critics

 
sameness
 
requires
 

parties

 

things

 

Between

 
incompatible

altered

 

grammars

 

stereotyped

 
sufficiently
 

respectable

 
originally
 

specimen

 

Doctor

 

proper

 

sources