FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1431   1432   1433   1434   1435   1436   1437   1438   1439   1440   1441   1442   1443   1444   1445   1446   1447   1448   1449   1450   1451   1452   1453   1454   1455  
1456   1457   1458   1459   1460   1461   1462   1463   1464   1465   1466   1467   1468   1469   1470   1471   1472   1473   1474   1475   1476   1477   1478   1479   1480   >>   >|  
!_" teaches thus: "Interjections sometimes _require_ the objective case after them, but they never _govern_ it. In the first edition of this grammar," says he, "I followed Mr. Murray and others, in leaving _we_, in the exercises to be turned into _us_; but that it should be _we_, and not _us_, is obvious; because it is the nominative to _are_ understood; thus, _Oh_ happy _are we_, or, _Oh we are_ happy, (being) surrounded with so many blessings."--_Lennie's Gram., Fifth Edition, Twelfth_, Here is an other solution of the construction of this pronoun of the first person, contradictory alike to Ingersoll's, to Kirkham's, and to Murray's; while _all are wrong_, and this among the rest. The word should indeed be _we_, and not _us_; because we have both analogy and good authority for the former case, and nothing but the false conceit of sundry grammatists for the latter. But it is a _nominative absolute_, like any other nominative which we use in the same exclamatory manner. For the first person may just as well be put in the nominative absolute, by exclamation, as any other; as, "Behold _I_ and the _children_ whom God hath given me!"--_Heb._, "Ecce _ego_ et _pueri_ quos mihi dedit Deus!"--_Beza_. "O brave _we!_"--_Dr. Johnson, often_. So Horace: "O _ego_ laevus," &c.--_Ep. ad Pi._, 301. "Ah! luckless _I!_ who purge in spring my spleen-- Else sure the first of bards had Horace been." --_Francis's Hor._, ii, 209. OBS. 5.--Whether Murray's remark above, on "_O! Oh!_ and _Ah!_" was originally designed for a _rule of government_ or not, it is hardly worth any one's while to inquire. It is too lame and inaccurate every way, to deserve any notice, but that which should serve to explode it forever. Yet no few, who have since made English grammars, have copied the text literally; as they have, for the public benefit, stolen a thousand other errors from the same quarter. The reader will find it, with little or no change, in Smith's New Grammar, p. 96 and 134; Alger's, 56; Allen's, 117; Russell's, 92; Blair's, 100, Guy's, 89; Abel Flint's, 59; A Teacher's, 43, Picket's, 210; Cooper's[439] Murray, 136; Wilcox's, 95; Bucke's, 87; Emmons's, 77; and probably in others. Lennie varies it _indefinitely_, thus: "RULE. The interjections _Oh!_ and _Ah!_ &c. _generally_ require the objective case of the first personal pronoun, _and_ the nominative of the second; as, Ah _me!_ O _thou_ fool! O _ye_ hypocrites!"--_Lennie's Gram._,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1431   1432   1433   1434   1435   1436   1437   1438   1439   1440   1441   1442   1443   1444   1445   1446   1447   1448   1449   1450   1451   1452   1453   1454   1455  
1456   1457   1458   1459   1460   1461   1462   1463   1464   1465   1466   1467   1468   1469   1470   1471   1472   1473   1474   1475   1476   1477   1478   1479   1480   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
nominative
 

Murray

 
Lennie
 
objective
 

require

 

person

 

absolute

 

pronoun

 

Horace

 
forever

English

 

benefit

 
literally
 
public
 
copied
 

Francis

 
grammars
 
explode
 

Whether

 

notice


inquire

 

remark

 

government

 

deserve

 

originally

 
stolen
 
inaccurate
 

designed

 

Wilcox

 

Cooper


Teacher
 
Picket
 

Emmons

 

hypocrites

 
personal
 
generally
 

varies

 

indefinitely

 

interjections

 
change

Grammar

 

errors

 

quarter

 
reader
 

Russell

 
thousand
 

contradictory

 

construction

 

Ingersoll

 

Kirkham