FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1441   1442   1443   1444   1445   1446   1447   1448   1449   1450   1451   1452   1453   1454   1455   1456   1457   1458   1459   1460   1461   1462   1463   1464   1465  
1466   1467   1468   1469   1470   1471   1472   1473   1474   1475   1476   1477   1478   1479   1480   1481   1482   1483   1484   1485   1486   1487   1488   1489   1490   >>   >|  
_, p. 47. According to common usage, it should be, "O for better times!" OBS. 16.--The interjection may be placed at the _beginning_ or the _end_ of a simple sentence, and sometimes _between_ its less intimate parts; but this part of speech is seldom, if ever, allowed to interrupt the connexion of any words which are closely united in sense. Murray's definition of an interjection, as I have elsewhere shown, is faulty, and directly contradicted by his example: "O virtue! how amiable thou art!"--_Octavo Gram._, i, 28 and 128; ii. 2. This was a favourite sentence with Murray, and he appears to have written it uniformly in this fashion; which, undoubtedly, is altogether right, except that the word _"virtue"_ should have had a capital Vee, because the quality is here personified. OBS. 17.--Misled by the false notion, that the term _interjection_ is appropriate only to what is "thrown in between the parts of a _sentence_," and perceiving that this is in fact but rarely the situation of this part of speech, a recent critic, (to whom I should owe some acknowledgements, if he were not wrong in every thing in which he charges me with error,) not only denounces this name as "_barbarous_," preferring Webster's loose term, "_exclamation_;" but avers, that, "The words called _interjection_ should _never_ be so used--should _always stand alone_; as, 'Oh! virtue, how amiable thou art.' 'Oh? Absalom, my son.' G. Brown," continues he, "drags one into the middle of a sentence, _where it never belonged_; thus, 'This enterprise, _alas_! will never compensate us for the trouble and expense with which it has been attended.' If G. B. meant the _enterprize_ of studying grammar, in the old theories, his sentiment is very appropriate; but his _alas_! he should have known enough to have put into the right place:--before the sentence representing the fact that excites the emotion expressed by _alas_! See on the Chart part 3, of RULE XVII. An _exclamation_ must _always precede_ the phrase or sentence describing the fact that excites the emotion to be expressed by the _exclamation_; as: Alas! I have alienated my friend! _Oh!_ Glorious hope of bliss secure!"--_Oliver B. Peirce's Gram._, p. 375. "O Glorious hope of bliss secure!"--_Ib._, p. 184. "O _glorious_ hope!"--_Ib._, p. 304. OBS. 18.--I see no reason to believe, that the class of words which have always, and almost universally, been called _interjections_, can ever be more conveniently expla
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1441   1442   1443   1444   1445   1446   1447   1448   1449   1450   1451   1452   1453   1454   1455   1456   1457   1458   1459   1460   1461   1462   1463   1464   1465  
1466   1467   1468   1469   1470   1471   1472   1473   1474   1475   1476   1477   1478   1479   1480   1481   1482   1483   1484   1485   1486   1487   1488   1489   1490   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
sentence
 

interjection

 
virtue
 
exclamation
 

Murray

 

emotion

 

excites

 

expressed

 

amiable

 
speech

secure

 

called

 
Glorious
 
expense
 
enterprize
 

studying

 
Absalom
 
attended
 

trouble

 

middle


grammar

 

enterprise

 

compensate

 

continues

 

belonged

 
glorious
 
friend
 

Oliver

 

Peirce

 

reason


conveniently
 
interjections
 

universally

 

alienated

 
representing
 
theories
 

sentiment

 

precede

 

phrase

 
describing

thrown

 

faulty

 

definition

 
closely
 

united

 
directly
 

contradicted

 

favourite

 

Octavo

 

connexion