FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1432   1433   1434   1435   1436   1437   1438   1439   1440   1441   1442   1443   1444   1445   1446   1447   1448   1449   1450   1451   1452   1453   1454   1455   1456  
1457   1458   1459   1460   1461   1462   1463   1464   1465   1466   1467   1468   1469   1470   1471   1472   1473   1474   1475   1476   1477   1478   1479   1480   1481   >>   >|  
p. 110; _Brace's_, 88. M'Culloch, after Crombie, thus: "RULE XX. Interjections are joined with the objective case of the pronoun of the first person, and with the nominative of the pronoun of the second; as, Ah me! O ye hypocrites."--_Manual of E. Gram._, p. 145; and _Crombie's Treatise_, p. 315; also _Fowler's E. Language_, p. 563. Hiley makes it a note, thus: "The interjections. O! Oh! Ah! _are followed by_ the objective case of a pronoun of the first person; as, _'Oh me!' 'Ah me!'_ but by the nominative case of the pronoun in the second person; as, '_O thou_ who dwellest.' "--_Hiley's Gram._, p. 82. This is what the same author elsewhere calls "THE GOVERNMENT OF INTERJECTIONS;" though, like some others, he had set it in the "Syntax of PRONOUNS." See _Ib._, p. 108. Murray, in forming his own little "Abridgment," omitted it altogether. In his other grammars, it is still a mere note, standing where he at first absurdly put it, under his rule for the agreement of pronouns with their antecedents. By many of his sage amenders, it has been placed in the catalogue of principal rules. But, that it is no adequate rule for interjections, is manifest; for, in its usual form, it is limited to _three_, and none of these can ever, with any propriety, be parsed by it. Murray himself has not used it in any of his forms of parsing. He conceived, (as I hinted before in Chapter 1st,) that, "The syntax of the Interjection is of _so very limited a nature_, that it _does not require_ a distinct, appropriate rule."--_Octavo Gram._, i. 224. OBS. 6.--Against this remark of Murray's, a good argument may be drawn from the ridiculous use which has been made of his own suggestion in the other place. For, though that suggestion never had in it the least shadow of truth, and was never at all applicable either to the three interjections, or to pronouns, or to cases, or to the persons, or to any thing else of which it speaks, it has not only been often copied literally, and called a "RULE" of syntax, but many have, yet more absurdly, made it a _general canon_ which imposes on all interjections a syntax that belongs to none of them. For example: "_An interjection must be followed_ by the objective case of a pronoun in the first person; _and_ by a nominative of the second person; as--_Oh me! ah me! oh thou! AH hail, ye_ happy men!"--_Jaudon's Gram._, p. 116. This is as much as to say, that every interjection must have a pronoun or two after it! Again: "
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1432   1433   1434   1435   1436   1437   1438   1439   1440   1441   1442   1443   1444   1445   1446   1447   1448   1449   1450   1451   1452   1453   1454   1455   1456  
1457   1458   1459   1460   1461   1462   1463   1464   1465   1466   1467   1468   1469   1470   1471   1472   1473   1474   1475   1476   1477   1478   1479   1480   1481   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
pronoun
 
person
 
interjections
 
Murray
 

syntax

 

nominative

 

objective

 
pronouns
 
limited
 

absurdly


suggestion

 

Crombie

 

interjection

 

argument

 
remark
 

Jaudon

 

Against

 

Octavo

 

require

 

Chapter


hinted

 

Interjection

 

distinct

 

nature

 

conceived

 

speaks

 

persons

 

copied

 

literally

 

belongs


general

 

called

 

applicable

 

imposes

 

ridiculous

 

shadow

 
amenders
 

GOVERNMENT

 
author
 
INTERJECTIONS

PRONOUNS

 

Syntax

 
dwellest
 

Interjections

 

joined

 

Culloch

 
hypocrites
 
Manual
 
Language
 

Fowler