FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222  
223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   >>   >|  
head had been cracked, the {p.204} Loyalists at length found themselves in possession of the field. In writing to Simprim a few days afterwards, Scott says--"You will be glad to hear that the _affair_ of Saturday passed over without any worse consequence to the Loyalists than that five, including your friend and humble servant Colonel Grogg, have been bound over to the peace, and obliged to give bail for their good behavior, which, you may believe, was easily found. The said Colonel had no less than three broken heads laid to his charge by as many of the Democrats." Alluding to Simprim's then recent appointment as Captain in the Perthshire Fencibles (Cavalry), he adds--"Among my own military (I mean mock-military) achievements, let me not fail to congratulate you and the country on the real character you have agreed to accept. Remember; in case of real action, I shall beg the honor of admission to your troop as a volunteer." One of the theatrical party, Sir Alexander Wood, whose notes lie before me, says--"Walter was certainly our Coryphaeus, and signalized himself splendidly in this desperate fray; and nothing used afterwards to afford him more delight than dramatizing its incidents. Some of the most efficient of our allies were persons previously unknown to him, and of several of these whom he had particularly observed, he never lost sight afterwards. There were, I believe, cases in which they owed most valuable assistance in life to his recollection of _the playhouse row_." To this last part of Sir Alexander's testimony I can also add mine; and I am sure my worthy friend, Mr. Donald M'Lean, W. S., will gratefully confirm it. When that gentleman became candidate for some office in the Exchequer, about 1822 or 1823, and Sir Walter's interest was requested on his behalf,--"To be sure!" said he; "did not he sound the charge upon Paddy? Can I ever forget Donald's _Sticks by G----t_?"[113] [Footnote 113: According to a friendly critic, one of the Liberals exclaimed, as the _row_ was thickening, "No Blows!"--and Donald, suiting the action to the word, responded, "Plows by ----!"--(1839.)] On {p.205} the 9th May, 1794, Charles Kerr of Abbotrule writes to him--"I was last night at Rosebank, and your uncle told me he had been giving you a very long and very sage lecture upon the occasion of these Edinburgh squabbles; I am happy to hear they are now at an end. They were rather of the s
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222  
223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Donald
 
charge
 
Alexander
 

action

 
military
 

Walter

 
Simprim
 
Loyalists
 

friend

 

Colonel


confirm

 
gratefully
 

candidate

 

gentleman

 

requested

 
behalf
 

interest

 

Exchequer

 

office

 

assistance


valuable

 

recollection

 

playhouse

 

possession

 

worthy

 

length

 

testimony

 

Rosebank

 
giving
 
writes

Charles

 
Abbotrule
 

lecture

 

occasion

 

Edinburgh

 

squabbles

 

Footnote

 

cracked

 

According

 

friendly


critic

 
forget
 

Sticks

 

Liberals

 

responded

 
suiting
 
exclaimed
 

thickening

 

Fencibles

 
Perthshire