te 1010: The arret of parliament of June 13th is given in
Histoire eccles., i. 291-293; Sommaire recit de la calomnieuse
accusation de Monsieur le prince de Conde, iii. 391-394. See also La
Place, 128-130; De Thou, iii. 50, 51; Journal de Bruslart, Mem. de
Conde, i. 39, 40.]

[Footnote 1011: Strange to say, the editor of the Memoires de Conde in
the Collection Michaud-Poujoulat expresses his disbelief of this
occurrence; but not only are the historians explicit, but an official
statement was drawn up and signed by the secretaries of state, under
Charles's orders. This notarial document is inserted in La Place, 139,
140, and in the Histoire ecclesiastique, i. 296, 297; De Thou, iii. 56,
gives the wrong date, Aug. 28th. Beza had from the lips of Conde, that
very afternoon, an account, which he transmitted the next day to Calvin.
Letter of Aug. 25th, _apud_ Baum, iii., App., 47.]

[Footnote 1012: La Place, 121; De Thou, iii. (liv. xxvii.) 40; Mem. de
Conde, ii. 24, 25.]

[Footnote 1013: La Place, 121, 122; De Thou, iii. (liv. xxvii.) 40, 41.]

[Footnote 1014: Letter of Beza to Wolf, March 25, 1561, _ap._ Baum, ii.,
App., 30, 31; The Journal de Jehan de la Fosse, under May, 1561 (p. 43),
has this entry: "Artus Desire fist amende honorable, tout nud, la torche
au poing, dedans le palais, en ung jeudy, 14^e du mois, et fut
condamne a rester dedans les Chartreux cinq ans au pain et a l'eau: il y
fut quatre moys; les ungs disent qu'il s'en fut, les aultres que les
Chartreux le firent sortir, craignant les huguenots. Depuis il ne se
cacha pas, et se promenoit a Paris."]

[Footnote 1015: "Ou il n'a rien entendu qui ne fust bon." Reg. capit.
Eccles. Rothom., March 16, 1561, _apud_ Floquet, Hist. du parlement de
Normandie, ii. 374, 375.]

[Footnote 1016: "Aliud est Christianum esse quatn Papistam non esse."
Letter to Wolf, March 25, 1561, _ap._ Baum, _ubi supra_.]

[Footnote 1017: This very year parliament had issued an order, at the
commencement of Lent, directing the sick, "permission prealablement
obtenue," to purchase the meat they needed of the butcher of the
Hotel-Dieu, who alone was permitted to sell, and who was compelled to
submit weekly to the court a record, not only of the permissions granted
and the persons to whom he sold, but even of the _quantity_ which each
applicant obtained! Registers of Parliament, Feb. 27, 1561, _apud_
Felibien, Histoire de Paris, iv., Preuves, 797.]

[Footnote 1018: Honorat de Savoie,