FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559  
560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   >>   >|  
, and the inscriptions on them contain a code of moral and religions precepts. They do not commemorate conquests, although the Asoka pillar at Allahabad has been utilized by later sovereigns for the recording of magniloquent inscriptions in praise of their grandeur. The best-known of the Asoka pillars are the two at Delhi, and the one at Allahabad. Many scholars have devoted themselves to the study of the inscriptions of Asoka, which may be said to form the foundation of authentic Indian history. The reader interested in the subject should consult Senart, _Les Inscriptions de Piyadasi_, t. I and II, Paris, 1881, 1886; V. A. Smith, _Asoka, the Buddhist Emperor of India_, 2nd ed.. Oxford, 1909; and 'The Monolithic Pillars or Columns of Asoka' (_Z.D.M.G._, 1911, pp. 221- 10). See also _E.H.I._, 3rd ed. (Oxford, 1914), chap. 6, 7, with Bibliography. Certain of the Gupta emperors in the fifth century A.C. also erected monolith pillars. Some of the pillars of the Gupta period commemorate victories; others are merely religious monuments. 18. Fergusson thought the Kutb Minar superior to Giotto's campanile at Florence in 'poetry of design and exquisite finish of detail'. He also held it to excel its taller Egyptian rival, the minaret of the mosque of Hasan at Cairo, in its nobler appearance, as well as in design and finish. To sum up, he held the Delhi monument to surpass any building of its class in the whole world. (_Hist. of Indian and Eastern Architecture_, ed. 1910, vol. ii, p. 206.) 19. Fergusson (ibid.) was mistaken in supposing that the Kutb Minar was intended for anything else than a _mazina_, or tower from which the call to prayers should be proclaimed. It is that and nothing else. Several examples of early mosques with only one _minar_ each are known, at Koil and Bayana, in India, as well as at Ghazni and Cairo. The unfinished _minar_ of Alauddin near the Kutb Minar was intended for a distinct building, namely, his addition to the original Kutb mosque. There was no 'other _minar_' connected with the Kutb Minar.(Cunningham, _A.S.R._ iv (1874), p. ix.) The current name of the Kutb Minar refers to the saint Khwaja Kutb- ud-din of Ush, who lies near the tower, and not to Sultan Kutb-ud-din Aibak or Ibak. The _minar_ was erected, about A.D. 1232, by Sultan Shams-ud-din Iltutmish (V. A. Smith, 'Who Built the Kutb Minar?' _East and West_, Bombay, Dec. 1907, pp. 1200-5; B. N. Munshi, _The Kutb Minar, Delhi_, Bombay, 191
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559  
560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

pillars

 

inscriptions

 

erected

 

Indian

 

Oxford

 

intended

 
mosque
 
Fergusson
 

finish

 

Allahabad


design

 
building
 

commemorate

 

Bombay

 
Sultan
 

Architecture

 

Eastern

 
mazina
 

appearance

 

proclaimed


prayers

 

nobler

 

supposing

 
mistaken
 

surpass

 
monument
 

unfinished

 

refers

 

Khwaja

 

Iltutmish


Munshi

 

current

 

Bayana

 

Ghazni

 

Alauddin

 

distinct

 

Several

 

examples

 

mosques

 

Cunningham


connected
 

addition

 

original

 

foundation

 

authentic

 

history

 

reader

 

devoted

 

interested

 

subject