FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248  
249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   >>   >|  
structure is taxation, by value, of concrete wealth at the place where it is situated (_in situ_). This should be regardless of the distribution of ownership or of the residence of the owner. The present misnamed "general property tax" already presents the main outlines of this form of taxation and the general changes necessary in law and method of assessment have been indicated above.[12] Corporation taxation may be adjusted to this either by separate treatment and assignment to state purposes only, or more simply for most states, by assimilating it with the general taxation of wealth and allotting due shares of the proceeds to the various taxing divisions.[13] The national government can, because of its exclusive power of levying tariff duties and also because of its exclusive control over interstate commerce, reach the tax-paying ability of the nation effectively by a combination of tariff and internal revenue taxes. These become a part of business costs, and are diffused over the whole population in general prices.[14] This system of impersonal wealth taxation may then be supplemented by personal taxation, applied through inheritance and income taxes. These forms of taxation extend over and reach many of the same persons and incomes as do ultimately the impersonal taxes. But the summation of personal incomes gives the necessary condition for applying the principle of progression so far as this is, by public opinion, deemed desirable either for fiscal or for social reasons. [Footnote 1: See above, ch.17, sec. 3, note, and sec. 5, on this distinction. The poll tax also is personal: see ch. 16, sec. 9.] [Footnote 2: In Utah the tax is 5 per cent on all estates over $10,000.] [Footnote 3. Exception, Utah.] [Footnote 4: Exceptions are Missouri, New Hampshire, Vermont, Virginia.] [Footnote 5: It would be more consistent with the purpose of equalizing fortunes to vary the rate not according to the size of the legacy but according to the size of the fortune which the legatee has, or would have, after receiving the legacy.] [Footnote 6: See Vol. I, p. 26.] [Footnote 7: In addition, certain items of receipts of companies or incomes of individuals are arbitrarily defined as property for purposes of taxation in a few cases in about fifteen other states. See Wealth, Debt, and Taxation, Report of the Bureau of the Census, 1907, p. 622.] [Footnote 8: Article XVI. The Congress shall have power to lay and col
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248  
249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

taxation

 

general

 

personal

 

incomes

 

wealth

 

states

 

purposes

 

legacy

 
exclusive

tariff

 

impersonal

 

property

 

Exceptions

 

Missouri

 

reasons

 

deemed

 
opinion
 
public
 
desirable

fiscal

 

social

 

Vermont

 

Hampshire

 

Exception

 

Virginia

 

estates

 

distinction

 
fifteen
 

Wealth


Taxation
 
individuals
 

arbitrarily

 
defined
 
Report
 
Bureau
 

Congress

 

Article

 
Census
 
companies

receipts
 

fortune

 

consistent

 
purpose
 
equalizing
 

fortunes

 

legatee

 

addition

 

receiving

 

supplemented