FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135  
136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   >>   >|  
ration: WINGBONES OF PTERODACTYLE, BAT, AND BIRD.] The term "homologous" may be applied to parts in two individual animals of different kinds, or to different parts of the same individual. Thus "the right and left hands," or "joints of the backbone," or "the teeth of the two jaws," are homologous parts of the same individual. But the arm of a man, the fore-leg of the horse, the paddle of the whale, and the wing of the bat and the bird are all also homologous parts, yet of another kind, _i.e._ they are the same parts existing in animals of different species. On the other hand, the wing of the humming-bird and the wing of the humming-bird moth are not homologous at all, or in any sense; for the resemblance between them consists solely in the use to which they are put, and is therefore only a relation of _analogy_. There is no relation of _homology_ between them, because they have no common resemblance as to their relations to surrounding parts, or as to their mode of origin. Similarly, there is no homology between the wing of the bat and that {158} of the flying-dragon, for the latter is formed of certain ribs, and not of limb bones. [Illustration: SKELETON OF THE FLYING DRAGON. (Showing the elongated ribs which support the flitting organ.)] Homology may be further distinguished into (1) a relationship which, on evolutionary principles, would be due to descent from a common ancestor, as the homological relation between the arm-bone of the horse and that of the ox, or between the singular ankle bones of the two lemurine genera, cheirogaleus and galago, and which relation has been termed by Mr. Ray Lankester "homogeny;"[162] and (2) a relationship induced, not derived--such as exists between parts closely similar in relative position, but with no genetic affinity, or only a remote one, as the homological relation between the chambers of the heart of a bat and those of a {159} bird, or the similar teeth of the thylacine and the dog before spoken of. For this relationship Mr. Bay Lankester has proposed the term "homoplasy." [Illustration: TARSAL BONES OF DIFFERENT LEMUROIDS. (Right tarsus of Galago; left tarsus of Cheirogaleus.)] [Illustration: A CENTIPEDE.] "Serial homology" is a relation of resemblance existing between two or more parts placed in series one behind the other in the same individual. Examples of such homologues are the ribs, or joints of the backbone of{160} a horse, or the limbs of a centiped
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135  
136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

relation

 

individual

 

homologous

 

relationship

 

resemblance

 

Illustration

 

homology

 

existing

 
humming
 

Lankester


joints
 

similar

 

animals

 
backbone
 

common

 
tarsus
 
homological
 

induced

 

exists

 

closely


derived

 

singular

 
ancestor
 

descent

 
lemurine
 

genera

 

homogeny

 

termed

 
cheirogaleus
 

galago


relative

 

Cheirogaleus

 

CENTIPEDE

 

Galago

 

DIFFERENT

 

LEMUROIDS

 

Serial

 

centiped

 
homologues
 
Examples

series

 

TARSAL

 

homoplasy

 

chambers

 

remote

 

affinity

 

genetic

 

thylacine

 

proposed

 

spoken