own home, where for
centuries the battles of the truth have been fought and won.
FOOTNOTES:
[169] _Essays and Reviews._ Edited, with an Introduction, by Rev. F. H.
Hedge, D. D. Boston, 1862.
[170] _Commentary on St. Paul's Epistles._--_Noyes' Essays_, pp.
222-276.
[171] _Essays and Reviews_, pp. 5-6.
[172] _Essays and Reviews_, p. 37.
[173] Ibid. p. 39.
[174] Ibid. pp. 35-36.
[175] For an able refutation of this point, _vid._ Houghton,
_Rationalism in the Church of England_, pp. 127-136.
[176] _Essays and Reviews_, p. 54.
[177] Ibid. p. 60.
[178] _Essays and Reviews_, p. 68.
[179] _Replies to Essays and Reviews_, p. 135.
[180] _Essays and Reviews_, p. 120.
[181] Ibid. p. 155.
[182] _Essays and Reviews_, p. 159.
[183] _Essays and Reviews_, pp. 195-196.
[184] Ibid. p. 277.
[185] _Essays and Reviews_, pp. 277-278.
[186] Ibid. p. 278.
[187] _Essays and Reviews_, p. 287.
[188] Ibid. pp. 328-329.
[189] _Essays and Reviews_, p. 446.
[190] _Evangelische Kirchenzeitung_, _Vorwort_, 1862.
[191] _Ecclesiastical Judgments of the Privy Council_, p. 289. Edited by
Hon. G. C. Brodrick, and the Rev. W. H. Freemantle. London, 1865. The
members of the Queen's Privy Council are as follows: Earls Granville and
Lonsdale; Duke of Buccleugh; Marquis of Salisbury; Lords Westbury,
Brougham, Cranworth, Wensleydale, St. Leonards, Chelmsford, and
Kindsdown; and Right Hons. Lushington, Bruce, Wigram, Ryan, Pollock,
Romilly, Turner, Cockburn, Coleridge, Erie, and Wylde.
[192] _Pentateuch and Book of Joshua_, Part I., pp. 49, 51-52. Am.
Edition.
[193] _Pentateuch and Book of Joshua_, Part I., pp. 60, 78, 81, 94, 105,
118, 138, 141, 185.
[194] _Pentateuch and Book of Joshua_, Part II., p. 60.
[195] Ibid. p. 296.
[196] _Pentateuch and Book of Joshua_, Part II., pp. 83, 84, 115.
[197] Ibid. p. 160.
[198] _Pentateuch and Book of Joshua_, Part II., p. 292.
CHAPTER XXII.
ENGLAND CONTINUED: SURVEY OF CHURCH PARTIES.
The Church of England has always been proud of the outward form of
unity. Her rigid view of the sin of schism has induced her to submit to
great elasticity of opinion and teaching rather than incur the
traditional disgrace of open division. But on this very account she has
never been free from internal strife. In everything but in name she has
been for centuries not one church, but several. Her entire history
discloses two tendencies balancing each othe
|