ructive doctrine "to the full consequences developed by
the Second Broad Church party in the National Church." The Unitarians
are divided into the staid disciples of Priestley and Belsham, and the
New School, who stand on the same ground with Theodore Parker in the
United States. These are cordial admirers of the _Essays and Reviews_,
and would rejoice to see the land overspread with radical Rationalism.
FOOTNOTES:
[199] _Essays Ecclesiastical and Social_, pp. 62-63.
[200] _Christian Work_, June, 1863.
[201] Conybeare, _Essays Ecclesiastical and Social_, pp. 65-71.
[202] _Tract No. 10._
[203] Sewel.
[204] Pusey, _Preface to 18th vol. Library of Church Fathers_.
[205] Conybeare, _Essays Ecclesiastical and Social_, p. 106.
[206] _Essays Ecclesiastical and Social_, pp. 106-108.
[207] _National Review_, Oct., 1856.
[208] _Development of Christian Doctrine._ Second Edition. London, 1846.
[209] _Phases of Faith_, pp. 233, 234. American Edition.
[210] Miss Cobbe, _Broken Lights_, p. 63. London Edition.
[211] Arnold, _Sermons_, vol. iv., p. 307.
[212] Ibid. _Introduction_, p. 56.
[213] _Bibliotheca Sacra._ Jan. 1858. An excellent summary of the
opinions of Dr. Arnold.
[214] Stanley, _Life and Correspondence of Arnold_. American Edition, p.
135.
[215] _Interpretation of Scripture_, p. 493.
[216] Stanley, _Life and Correspondence_, pp. 341, 367.
[217] _Fragment on the Church_, p. 226.
[218] _Christian Life, its Course, &c._, p. 358.
[219] _American Theological Review_, July, 1863.
[220] _Edinburgh Review_, July, 1864.
[221] Miss Cobbe, _Broken Lights_, p. 63. London Edition.
[222] _Tracts for Priests and People._ Preface, pp. 3-5. Am. Edition.
[223] Hughes, in _Tracts for Priests and People_, p. 28.
[224] Hughes, in _Tracts for Priests and People_, p. 37.
[225] Garden, _Tracts for Priests and People_, p. 133.
[226] Davies, _Tracts for Priests and People_, p. 167.
[227] Ibid. p. 167.
[228] _Broken Lights_, pp. 73-74.
[229] Appleton's _American Cyclopaedia_. Art. _Church of England_. Though
the writer of this article says nothing of the Irish clergy, he has not
included them, of course; having no doubt used the Clergy List of
England and the colonies alone.
[230] We have based our division of the English clergy upon the
calculation of the late W. J. Conybeare, a Fellow in the University of
Cambridge, and joint author with J. S. Howson, of _Life and Epistles
|