FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2128   2129   2130   2131   2132   2133   2134   2135   2136   2137   2138   2139   2140   2141   2142   2143   2144   2145   2146   2147   2148   2149   2150   2151   2152  
2153   2154   2155   2156   2157   2158   2159   2160   2161   2162   2163   2164   2165   2166   2167   2168   2169   2170   2171   2172   2173   2174   2175   2176   2177   >>   >|  
e commissioners to apply donations and bequests according to the intention of the donor or donors. The thirteenth clause also obviated the existing difficulty under the statute of mortmain, which made bequests chargeable upon land for a given class of persons, or their successors. This clause would enable real or personal property, without limitation as to its amount, to be held in perpetuity, for building and maintaining chapels, for building and maintaining residences for the Roman Catholic clergy, or for the use of the priests for the time being, for the purpose of any particular charge. In conclusion, Sir James Graham said that he could only anticipate one objection to the bill on tire part of the Roman Catholics, and that arose from the peculiarity of their ecclesiastical jurisdiction. He believed they would object to the decision of any ecclesiastical matters relating to their church by persons who were not in holy orders of the church of Rome; but he would remind them that under the existing law, such matters might be brought before the supreme judicial tribunal of the country--the judge of that court, the lord-chancellor, being a Protestant. According to the present bill, however, such matters would be left to the decision of a board, composed of Protestants and Catholics equal in number. The bill was loudly condemned by Messrs. More, O'Ferral, Bellew, and Shiel; while, on the other hand, Lord Arundel thanked government for the conciliatory spirit it displayed. Mr. Hume said that the bill seemed to him to be framed in a spirit of peace, and he wished all the Irish grievances were met in the same feeling. The proposed tribunal was a fair and proper one, and he should be glad to see as good a one for the administration of English charities: there ought to be "justice to England." The second reading was carried by a majority of seventy-one against five; and on the motion that the bill should be committed, Mr. M. J. O'Connell gave notice that he should in committee move amendments. The bill having been subsequently reported, and being moved for a third reading, Mr. Dominick Browne expressed a wish for its postponement. The Roman Catholic hierarchy, he said, was entirely opposed to it; although he admitted that he believed it to be proposed in a spirit of conciliation. He moved that the bill be read that day three months; but the amendment found no one to second it; and after a few observations from Mr. M. J. O'Connell
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2128   2129   2130   2131   2132   2133   2134   2135   2136   2137   2138   2139   2140   2141   2142   2143   2144   2145   2146   2147   2148   2149   2150   2151   2152  
2153   2154   2155   2156   2157   2158   2159   2160   2161   2162   2163   2164   2165   2166   2167   2168   2169   2170   2171   2172   2173   2174   2175   2176   2177   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

matters

 
spirit
 

believed

 

building

 

Catholics

 

existing

 

church

 

maintaining

 

Connell

 

clause


Catholic

 

proposed

 

persons

 

decision

 

bequests

 

tribunal

 

ecclesiastical

 

reading

 

feeling

 

proper


Arundel

 

thanked

 

Ferral

 

Bellew

 

government

 

conciliatory

 

grievances

 

wished

 
framed
 

displayed


seventy

 

hierarchy

 
opposed
 

postponement

 

Dominick

 

Browne

 

expressed

 

admitted

 

conciliation

 

observations


amendment

 

months

 
reported
 

subsequently

 

justice

 
England
 

carried

 

majority

 

administration

 
English