FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1801   1802   1803   1804   1805   1806   1807   1808   1809   1810   1811   1812   1813   1814   1815   1816   1817   1818   1819   1820   1821   1822   1823   1824   1825  
1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831   1832   1833   1834   1835   1836   1837   1838   1839   1840   1841   1842   1843   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   >>   >|  
erving of animadversion. On the 21st of April Mr. Hardy again brought the subject forward, by moving a series of resolutions, which declared that in the transactions regarding this seat, a breach of privilege had been committed. The committee itself had found it proved, he said, that the L2,000 had been paid and received; and if the circumstances under which the payment and receipt were made did not constitute a breach of privilege, he had yet to learn what did. He entered at length into the transaction, and concluded by asserting that there could not be a grosser case in all its bearings. There had been a contract to sell a seat in parliament for L2,000. which money was to be appropriated in a corrupt manner in every respect. From the evidence respecting the Carlow club, and the L1,000 to be applied to county purposes, nothing could be clearer than this, that any tenant who fell into arrear of rent from want of prudence or honesty, had only to say to the club, "My landlord is against you: if you expect my vote, you must pay my arrears of rent." What a system was this! If this were to pass unnoticed, who could object to the formation of Conservative clubs which would say to those shopkeepers, before whose doors the priests threatened the grass should grow, we will indemnify you. Better be without the reform-bill than see it leading to consequences like these. In former days they had to complain of boroughs being sold: now they had to complain of the sale of whole counties. Mr. O'Connell applauded the conduct of the members, of the committee: he would take this stand on their report. The agitator was defended by Lord Francis Egerton; not that he would wish to imitate his conduct in many respects, but he thought that he stood acquitted of pecuniary corruption: that charge was removed, and he did not feel inclined to go upon the minor questions arising out of the case, because he wished to be indulgent as well as just. The transaction did not meet with his approbation, but he looked upon it as part, at least, of the extensive system now carried on in Ireland; and however strongly he might deprecate that system, he doubted whether it would be just or expedient to bring the member for Dublin, or the other parties concerned in the transaction, within the resolutions of the house. He was not one of those who felt a desire to bring any man within the scope of a breach of their privileges. His own hands were as clean as those of mo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1801   1802   1803   1804   1805   1806   1807   1808   1809   1810   1811   1812   1813   1814   1815   1816   1817   1818   1819   1820   1821   1822   1823   1824   1825  
1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831   1832   1833   1834   1835   1836   1837   1838   1839   1840   1841   1842   1843   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

transaction

 

system

 
breach
 

complain

 

conduct

 

resolutions

 

committee

 

privilege

 

members

 

parties


Egerton

 
concerned
 
applauded
 

report

 
agitator
 
defended
 

Francis

 

privileges

 

counties

 

consequences


leading

 

reform

 

desire

 

boroughs

 

Connell

 

member

 

doubted

 

deprecate

 

wished

 
indulgent

Better

 

approbation

 
extensive
 

carried

 

strongly

 
looked
 

expedient

 
acquitted
 

pecuniary

 
thought

respects

 

Dublin

 

Ireland

 
corruption
 

charge

 

questions

 
arising
 

removed

 

inclined

 
imitate