FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1808   1809   1810   1811   1812   1813   1814   1815   1816   1817   1818   1819   1820   1821   1822   1823   1824   1825   1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831   1832  
1833   1834   1835   1836   1837   1838   1839   1840   1841   1842   1843   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   1857   >>   >|  
rts, and the additional fifty per cent, on spirit licenses. The amount of all the taxes which he proposed to remit would be L351,000 this year, though when the proposed reductions came into full operation it would amount to L568,000. At the same time, when the increased consumption of paper was taken into account, the money collected from the penny stamp, and the increase of duty from advertisements, he thought he might say that government would not lose L530,000 a year. The reduction of the stamp on newspapers was from fourpence to one penny, and this was deemed by many as being a sacrifice to the demands of a political party, and not a concession to principles of political economy or fiscal regulations. There were many other articles, it was contended, a reduction of the duties on which would contribute much more to the comfort of the community, and especially of those classes to which it was proposed to give cheap newspapers and cheap spirits. Sir C. Knightley moved, that instead of diminishing the duty on newspapers, the duty on soap should be reduced. This he represented as a duty which pressed not only severely on the lower classes, but unequally in comparison with the more wealthy--the soap of the poor man being taxed at seventy-five per cent., and that of the rich man only at thirty per cent. This motion was seconded by Mr. C. Barclay, who showed that the revenue would not sustain a greater loss from the reduction of this tax than would arise from the diminution in newspaper stamp duties. The chancellor of the exchequer, however, preferred a reduction of the stamp duties to those on soap; and on a division the motion was negatived by a majority of two hundred and forty-one against two hundred and eight. As the law stood, there was no distinction between newspapers in regard of duty on account of their size, all differences of this nature having been removed in 1828. By the new bill, however, this distinction was restored, an additional duty being imposed on every newspaper containing more than a certain number of square inches of surface. Government was accused of having so selected the particular number of inches, as to impose the additional duty on some of the most influential journals opposed to them, while it did not apply to their supporters. This imputation was repelled by the chancellor of the exchequer; but it was still maintained that such must have been its effect. It was finally proposed and acceded t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1808   1809   1810   1811   1812   1813   1814   1815   1816   1817   1818   1819   1820   1821   1822   1823   1824   1825   1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831   1832  
1833   1834   1835   1836   1837   1838   1839   1840   1841   1842   1843   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   1857   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

proposed

 
newspapers
 

reduction

 

additional

 

duties

 

inches

 

political

 

number

 

chancellor

 

exchequer


newspaper

 

motion

 

classes

 

distinction

 

hundred

 

account

 

amount

 

maintained

 

majority

 

division


acceded

 

sustain

 

greater

 

diminution

 

finally

 

repelled

 

negatived

 

preferred

 
effect
 

imputation


influential

 

journals

 
imposed
 

square

 

surface

 

Government

 

selected

 

revenue

 

impose

 

restored


differences

 

regard

 
accused
 

supporters

 

nature

 
removed
 

opposed

 

government

 

thought

 
advertisements