FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1811   1812   1813   1814   1815   1816   1817   1818   1819   1820   1821   1822   1823   1824   1825   1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831   1832   1833   1834   1835  
1836   1837   1838   1839   1840   1841   1842   1843   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   1857   1858   1859   1860   >>   >|  
His statements, on the other hand, were represented by Sir George Grey, on the part of government, as being mere repetitions of charges which had been abandoned by those who had made them. The motion was supported by Dr. Lushington and Mr. Fowell Buxton, the latter of whom said, that few persons residing in that colony knew its affairs better than himself: the slave-trade prevailed in the Mauritius to such an extent, that no man could live for a single week as governor of the island and not behold it under his own eyes; yet not one of the persons engaged in the traffic had ever been brought to justice. The reason assigned for this impunity was this--that no court would authorise a conviction, and that no public functionary would countenance the man who dared to interfere with their trade. If a case arose in which it was necessary that the prosecution should be placed upon record, the accused was, on the first opportunity, set at liberty. The motion was negatived by a majority of two hundred and twenty-nine against seventy-one. It has been recorded in previous pages that political discontents prevailed in Canada. A large portion of the population, French in its origin, democratic and intemperate in its views, led on by demagogues, insisted on demands equally inconsistent with a monarchical government, and with the supremacy of the mother country. Democratical as were their views, however, they had their supporters in the British parliament. On the 16th of May, Mr. Roebuck brought forward a proposition for the reform of the Canadian constitution, which was to consist in nothing less than in making both branches of the colonial legislature elective. By the statute 81 George III., c. 81, a constitution was given to the province of Quebec, which was thereby divided into Lower and Upper Canada. The constitution so conferred was professedly a copy of the constitution of England, the governor being as the king, the legislative council as the house of lords, and the house of assembly as the house of commons. The object, Mr. Roebuck said, which he had in view, was to amend the legislative council, which was no more like the house of lords at home than the governor of the colony was like the king of these realms. The members of the legislative council, unlike the house of lords, were poor, having no tenants, and consequently no influence over the people; they were a _clique_ holding power for their own purposes. On the explanati
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1811   1812   1813   1814   1815   1816   1817   1818   1819   1820   1821   1822   1823   1824   1825   1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831   1832   1833   1834   1835  
1836   1837   1838   1839   1840   1841   1842   1843   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   1857   1858   1859   1860   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

constitution

 

council

 
governor
 

legislative

 

Roebuck

 

colony

 

prevailed

 

persons

 

Canada

 

motion


government

 
brought
 
George
 

forward

 
proposition
 
reform
 

portion

 

making

 

branches

 

explanati


purposes

 

consist

 

Canadian

 

Democratical

 

demands

 

equally

 

inconsistent

 

monarchical

 

insisted

 
origin

intemperate

 

demagogues

 
supremacy
 

mother

 

supporters

 
British
 

parliament

 
democratic
 

country

 
French

population

 

Quebec

 

object

 
commons
 

people

 

England

 
clique
 

assembly

 

unlike

 
members