FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1861   1862   1863   1864   1865   1866   1867   1868   1869   1870   1871   1872   1873   1874   1875   1876   1877   1878   1879   1880   1881   1882   1883   1884   1885  
1886   1887   1888   1889   1890   1891   1892   1893   1894   1895   1896   1897   1898   1899   1900   1901   1902   1903   1904   1905   1906   1907   1908   1909   1910   >>   >|  
on the subject, which motion he brought forward on the 18th of April. He moved an address to the king, "praying his majesty not to renew the order in council of the 10th of June, 1835, granting permission to British subjects to enlist in the service of the Queen of Spain, which order in council would expire on the 10th of June next following; and praying also that directions be given that his majesty's marine forces shall not be employed in the civil contests now prevailing in Spain, otherwise than in that naval co-operation which his majesty has engaged to afford, if necessary, under the stipulations of the treaty." The motion was seconded by Sir Stratford Canning, who argued that the terms of the quadruple treaty did not justify the interference which government had sanctioned. On the other hand Lord Leveson contended that government had gained great credit on the continent by the part they had taken in the affairs of the Peninsula. Mr. Charles Wood defended ministers: it was not uncommon, he said, for British officers to enter into the service of foreign powers. Mr. O'Connell remarked on the eagerness with which the recent disasters of the legion had been seized upon by gentlemen on the opposite side. The actions in which they had clone honour to the British name were forgotten: nothing was said of their victories; but not a moment was lost in bringing forward their defeat. On the second night of the debate, Sir Robert Inglis adverted to the imputation which had been cast against his party--that they were the enemies of the church of Rome in their own country, but its friends in every other--from its association with despotism. He disclaimed any such feeling on their part. Mr. Ward considered that opposition tried this question merely by the test of success. Why did not Sir Henry Hardinge bring forward his motion soon after the victory at Bilboa? This was the first time that he had heard in the house of commons the misfortunes of an ally urged as a reason for abandoning him. No doubt the legion had suffered a defeat; but not such as to disable their continuance of the contest. General Evans had admitted his losses; yet it was at this moment that an old brother officer in arms had chosen to aggravate his difficulties, and to cast against him the weight of his authority in military matters. In reply to the imputation as to the motives in bringing forward the motion at this particular time, Lord Mahon contended that he a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1861   1862   1863   1864   1865   1866   1867   1868   1869   1870   1871   1872   1873   1874   1875   1876   1877   1878   1879   1880   1881   1882   1883   1884   1885  
1886   1887   1888   1889   1890   1891   1892   1893   1894   1895   1896   1897   1898   1899   1900   1901   1902   1903   1904   1905   1906   1907   1908   1909   1910   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

forward

 

motion

 
British
 

majesty

 

contended

 

government

 

praying

 

treaty

 

council

 

defeat


bringing

 

moment

 

legion

 

imputation

 

service

 

friends

 
country
 

brother

 

motives

 

losses


disclaimed

 

despotism

 

association

 

officer

 
debate
 

difficulties

 

weight

 
Robert
 

Inglis

 
feeling

enemies
 
chosen
 

adverted

 

aggravate

 

church

 

suffered

 

military

 
victory
 
disable
 

matters


Bilboa

 
abandoning
 
misfortunes
 

commons

 

authority

 

question

 
admitted
 

reason

 

considered

 

opposition