FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1701   1702   1703   1704   1705   1706   1707   1708   1709   1710   1711   1712   1713   1714   1715   1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   1722   1723   1724   1725  
1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731   1732   1733   1734   1735   1736   1737   1738   1739   1740   1741   1742   1743   1744   1745   1746   1747   1748   1749   1750   >>   >|  
The division on the amendment gave seventy-six peers for the second reading, and only thirteen against it. In the committee Lord Alvanley proposed that the bill should be dropped. Lord Wynford urged strong objections to the central board of commissioners, but this was defended by the lord-chancellor, the Earl of Winchilsea, and the Duke of Wellington. The only alteration made in the clauses respecting them and their powers was an addition proposed by the Duke of Wellington, to the effect that they should be bound to keep a record of each letter received, the date of its reception, the person from whom it came, the subject to which it related, and the minute of any answer given to it, or made thereon, and also, where the commissioners differed, of the opinion of each commissioner, and that a copy of such record be transmitted to the secretary-of-state once a year-, or oftener if required. The Bishop of Exeter moved to substitute for the leading enactment in reference to bastardy, "That the father and mother of an illegitimate child, or the survivor of them, shall be required to support such child, and that no parish shall be bound to support such child whilst either parent is able to do so, and that all relief occasioned by the wants of such child shall be considered as relief afforded to the father and mother, or the survivor of them." This amendment, however, was negatived by thirty-eight votes against thirty-four; but the clause itself, being that which the house of commons, on the motion of Mr. Miles, had substituted for the original clause, was likewise rejected. On the third reading the Bishop of Exeter again brought the question before the house, by moving the omission of the clause which provided that any person marrying a woman who had an illegitimate child or children by another man, should be liable to maintain them. The original clause, however, was retained, although by a majority of only eleven, eighty-two voting for and seventy-one against it. Instead of the rejected clause which Mr. Miles had carried in the house of commons, clauses were introduced on the motion of the Duke of Wellington, enacting, that the putative father of any bastard child, so soon as such child became chargeable to the parish by the mother's inability to maintain it, should be liable to reimburse to the parish the expenses of its maintenance until it attained the age of seven years, on his paternity being proved before the quarter-se
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1701   1702   1703   1704   1705   1706   1707   1708   1709   1710   1711   1712   1713   1714   1715   1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   1722   1723   1724   1725  
1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731   1732   1733   1734   1735   1736   1737   1738   1739   1740   1741   1742   1743   1744   1745   1746   1747   1748   1749   1750   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

clause

 

parish

 
Wellington
 

mother

 

father

 

required

 

person

 

Bishop

 

record

 

relief


motion

 
original
 
rejected
 

maintain

 
liable
 
commons
 

support

 

survivor

 

thirty

 

illegitimate


Exeter

 

reading

 

clauses

 

amendment

 

seventy

 

proposed

 

commissioners

 

brought

 

moving

 
question

omission

 

children

 
provided
 

marrying

 

likewise

 
committee
 

Alvanley

 
thirteen
 

substituted

 
retained

expenses

 

maintenance

 

reimburse

 
inability
 

chargeable

 

attained

 
proved
 

quarter

 

paternity

 
eighty