FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1730   1731   1732   1733   1734   1735   1736   1737   1738   1739   1740   1741   1742   1743   1744   1745   1746   1747   1748   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754  
1755   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   1762   1763   1764   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769   1770   1771   1772   1773   1774   1775   1776   1777   1778   1779   >>   >|  
t lord of the treasury; Mr. Spring-Rice became chancellor of the exchequer; Lord Auckland was the first lord of the admiralty; Sir John Cam Hob-house, president of the board of control; Mr. Poulett Thompson, president of the board of trade; Lord Dun-cannon was placed at the head of the woods and forests; Lord John Russell took his place in the home department; the colonial office was given to Mr. Charles Grant; the seals of the foreign office were again entrusted to Lord Palmerston; Viscount Howick was secretary-at-war; Sir Henry Parnell was paymaster-general; Mr. Cutlar Ferguson, judge-advocate-general; and Sir John Campbell and Mr. Rolfe again became attorney and solicitor-general. There was no lord-chancellor appointed; the great seal was put in commission, the commissioners being the master of the rolls, the vice-chancellor, and Mr. Justice Bosanquet; Lord Mulgrave was made lord-lieutenant of Ireland, with Lord Plunkett once more as chancellor, and Lord Morpeth as Irish secretary. Mr. Perrin was named attorney-general, and Mr. O'Loghlin, solicitor-general. The lord-advocate of Scotland was Mr. J. A. Murray; the Marquis of Conyngham was postmaster-general; and the Marquis of Welles-ley, lord-chamberlain. After the announcement had been made, the house adjourned to the 30th of April, but with an understanding that no public business should be undertaken till the 12th of May. In the upper house Lord Alvanley asked Lord Melbourne how the ministry stood in regard to Mr. O'Connell and his followers. He wished to know whether government had or had not secured their aid; and if they had, the terms on which that support had been obtained. Lord Brougham said that these questions were improper, and advised Lord Melbourne not to answer them. Lord Melbourne, however, was more courteous. The noble lord had asked him, he said, how far he coincided in opinion with Mr. O'Connell? His answer was, "Not at all. As for the question as to 'whether I have taken any means to secure the assistance of Mr. O'Connell, and if so, on what terms?' I answer that I do not know whether I shall have his assistance or not. I have taken no means to secure it, nor have I said anything from which any inference could be drawn in order to secure that individual's support." As to tithes, Lord Melbourne said, that he did not hesitate to say that he considered himself pledged to act on the resolution of the other house. After the houses had adjourned, the new
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1730   1731   1732   1733   1734   1735   1736   1737   1738   1739   1740   1741   1742   1743   1744   1745   1746   1747   1748   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754  
1755   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   1762   1763   1764   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769   1770   1771   1772   1773   1774   1775   1776   1777   1778   1779   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

general

 

chancellor

 
Melbourne
 

Connell

 

answer

 

secure

 

support

 

advocate

 

attorney

 

solicitor


assistance

 
secretary
 
adjourned
 

Marquis

 
office
 
president
 

advised

 

followers

 

questions

 

improper


regard

 

coincided

 

opinion

 

admiralty

 

courteous

 

secured

 

cannon

 

government

 

wished

 
Thompson

obtained

 

Brougham

 
control
 

Poulett

 

tithes

 
hesitate
 

individual

 
considered
 

houses

 
resolution

pledged

 

inference

 

exchequer

 
Spring
 

Auckland

 

question

 
treasury
 

Bosanquet

 

Mulgrave

 
lieutenant