FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   1762   1763   1764   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769   1770   1771   1772   1773   1774   1775   1776   1777   1778   1779   1780  
1781   1782   1783   1784   1785   1786   1787   1788   1789   1790   1791   1792   1793   1794   1795   1796   1797   1798   1799   1800   1801   1802   1803   1804   1805   >>   >|  
land and Scotland." These words raised a question of importance between the contending parties, for, as the municipal acts of England and Scotland established a L5 franchise in one country, and a L10 franchise in the other, to establish in Ireland a system of municipal government founded on a similar basis, was to transfer to the Papists that monopoly of municipal authority hitherto enjoyed by the Protestants. The Duke of Wellington objected to the house being required, in voting the address, to pledge itself to the principles of any measure before the measure itself had come regularly before the house. He moved to substitute the following amendment:--"We shall proceed without delay to the consideration of any defects or evils that may have been shown to exist in these institutions, for the purpose of applying such remedies as may obviate all just causes of complaint, and insure the impartial administration of justice." Several peers supported this amendment, and the defeat of government was inevitable; but, on seeing this, the Marquis of Lansdowne intimated that ministers conceded the point as one of no particular moment, and the address was then agreed to. In the commons, however, government was stronger, and, therefore, did not exhibit the same spirit of concession. Sir Robert Peel moved the same amendment which the Duke of Wellington had moved in the lords. Lord John Russell defended the clause in the address. Lord Stanley supported the amendment. Lords Howick and Palmerston, and Mr. O'Connell spoke in favour of the address. Mr. O'Connell gave notice, that if Ireland got less than had been granted to England and Scotland, the cry of repeal would immediately be resumed. With an air of self-importance he cautioned the house to beware; if they excited that cry again, it would be at their peril. On a division the address was carried by a majority of two hundred and eighty-four against two hundred and forty-three. THE QUESTION OF ORANGE LODGES. On the reassembling of parliament, Mr. O'Connell and his friends lost no time in returning to the attack made last session on Orange lodges. On the 21st of February Mr. Finn moved this resolution:--"That Orangeism has been productive of the most baneful effects upon the character and administration of public justice in Ireland; that its presence in the constabulary and peace preservation force and yeomanry corps of that country has led individual members, as well as large
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   1762   1763   1764   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769   1770   1771   1772   1773   1774   1775   1776   1777   1778   1779   1780  
1781   1782   1783   1784   1785   1786   1787   1788   1789   1790   1791   1792   1793   1794   1795   1796   1797   1798   1799   1800   1801   1802   1803   1804   1805   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

address

 

amendment

 
Connell
 

government

 

Ireland

 

Scotland

 

municipal

 

Wellington

 

hundred

 

measure


supported

 
administration
 
justice
 

franchise

 
country
 
importance
 

England

 

Howick

 

excited

 

division


carried

 

majority

 

defended

 

clause

 

Stanley

 

beware

 

immediately

 

notice

 

repeal

 
granted

resumed

 

cautioned

 
favour
 

Palmerston

 

effects

 
character
 

public

 
baneful
 

resolution

 
Orangeism

productive

 

presence

 

constabulary

 
individual
 

members

 

preservation

 
yeomanry
 

February

 

ORANGE

 
LODGES