FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1745   1746   1747   1748   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   1762   1763   1764   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769  
1770   1771   1772   1773   1774   1775   1776   1777   1778   1779   1780   1781   1782   1783   1784   1785   1786   1787   1788   1789   1790   1791   1792   1793   1794   >>   >|  
the report and the proposition were to be laid on the tables of both houses of parliament; and the ecclesiastical commissioners, after the expiration of six months, would be empowered to carry the proposition into effect, if parliament should not otherwise direct. The bill was brought in and read a first time. It contained two distinct sets of provisions--some relating solely to the mode of collecting tithe, and others which established a new distribution of the church funds, so as to create a surplus to be applied to other purposes. Sir Robert Peel gave notice on the 7th of July, that, on the motion for committing the bill, he would move an instruction to the committee to divide it into two bills, that he might have an opportunity of rejecting altogether those parts of the bill which suppressed the Protestant churches of eight hundred and sixty parishes, appropriating their revenues to purposes not immediately in connection with the interests of the established church, and of supporting those provisions in which he could concur. The bill was read a second time _pro forma_ on the 13th of July, and the motion to commit it was made on the 21st. Sir Robert Peel moved the instruction of which he had given notice. Mr. Spring Rice answered Sir Robert Peel. The debate was continued by adjournment on the 22nd and 23rd of July, the leading speakers in support of the motion being Sirs R. H. Inglis and J. Graham, Lord Stanley, and Messrs. Lefroy and Jackson; while the ministerial side of the question was maintained by Lords Howick, Morpeth, and J. Russell, and Messrs. Hume, Shiel, and O'Connell. On a division ministers had a majority of three hundred and nineteen against two hundred and eighty-two, a majority which secured the success of the bill in the commons. It passed, in fact, without any further opposition, the minority declining to discuss details which, in their opinion, could not be amended except by omitting them. Ministers, however, seem to have been convinced that Sir Robert Peel was correct in stating that they would have no surplus, for they introduced a clause providing that the consolidated fund should immediately begin to make an annual payment of L50,000, for the purposes of general education in Ireland, on the faith of the anticipated surplus, from which it was to be repaid. The bill passed the commons on the 12th of August, and the second reading took place in the house of lords on the 20th. No opposition was
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1745   1746   1747   1748   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   1762   1763   1764   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769  
1770   1771   1772   1773   1774   1775   1776   1777   1778   1779   1780   1781   1782   1783   1784   1785   1786   1787   1788   1789   1790   1791   1792   1793   1794   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Robert

 

surplus

 
hundred
 

motion

 

purposes

 

opposition

 

passed

 

parliament

 

notice

 

established


church

 
commons
 
proposition
 

Messrs

 
immediately
 
majority
 

instruction

 

provisions

 

ministers

 

division


payment

 

education

 

Connell

 

Ireland

 

annual

 

secured

 

success

 

eighty

 

nineteen

 
Morpeth

Stanley

 

Lefroy

 
Graham
 

Inglis

 

Jackson

 
Howick
 

Russell

 
general
 

maintained

 
ministerial

question

 

omitting

 

anticipated

 
Ministers
 

repaid

 

stating

 
clause
 

providing

 

consolidated

 
convinced