FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1708   1709   1710   1711   1712   1713   1714   1715   1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   1722   1723   1724   1725   1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731   1732  
1733   1734   1735   1736   1737   1738   1739   1740   1741   1742   1743   1744   1745   1746   1747   1748   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   1757   >>   >|  
which was negatived without a division: the original motion was lost by a majority of fifty. Subsequently Colonel Evans moved for leave to bring in a bill for the amendment of the reform act, in so far as it made the payment of rates and taxes an essential qualification for voting at parliamentary elections, which was supported by Messrs. Hume, Roebuck, Attwood, and O'Connell. The motion was opposed by Lords John Russell and Althorp; and it was lost, on a division, by a majority of eighty-seven. Previous to this, Lord John Russell had introduced a bill to prevent bribery at elections, which had passed the commons. The peers had referred this bill to a select committee; and on the 28th of July, the Marquis of Lansdowne, on presenting the report of the committee, stated that there had been no interference with the powers possessed by the election committees of the house of commons. The single object kept in view by the committee was the attainment of the proposed end in the speediest manner possible. Accordingly an amendment on the bill was suggested, by which it was directed that, when a committee of the house of commons had come to the conclusion that gross and extensive bribery had been committed in any place, the result of that inquiry should be laid before their lordships; and then the crown should issue a commission, over which one of the judges should preside, to form a court of inquiry on the whole matter in dispute. He proposed that this court should consist of seven members of the house of commons, five of their lordships, and one judge, who should have the power of calling before them all persons and documents affecting the subject of inquiry; that the witnesses should be exempted from the consequences of*any evidence which they might be called on to give; and that a statement of the result having been drawn up, any legislative enactment with regard to the alleged abuse should be left to the discretion of the two houses of parliament. When these amendments were brought under the consideration of the lower house, Lord John Russell thought them of so extensive a nature as to render the bill almost a new measure; and ultimately he agreed to withdraw it. On the 15th of April, Mr. Roebuck moved for a select committee to inquire into the political condition of the Canadas. These provinces, he said, in consequence of bad government, were in a state of revolt. By their constitution they had a governor, a legislative
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1708   1709   1710   1711   1712   1713   1714   1715   1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   1722   1723   1724   1725   1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731   1732  
1733   1734   1735   1736   1737   1738   1739   1740   1741   1742   1743   1744   1745   1746   1747   1748   1749   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   1757   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

committee

 

commons

 
inquiry
 

Russell

 

legislative

 

extensive

 

elections

 

bribery

 

select

 

Roebuck


proposed

 
amendment
 
lordships
 

majority

 
division
 
motion
 

result

 

statement

 

called

 

calling


enactment

 

dispute

 

documents

 

exempted

 

affecting

 

witnesses

 

members

 

subject

 

evidence

 
persons

consequences

 

consist

 
consideration
 

political

 

condition

 
Canadas
 

inquire

 
withdraw
 

provinces

 
revolt

constitution

 

governor

 

government

 
consequence
 

agreed

 

ultimately

 
houses
 

parliament

 

discretion

 
alleged