FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204  
205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   >>   >|  
al and vegetable forms, and the enormous lapse of time indicated by the accumulation of fossiliferous strata, the only circumstance to be wondered at is, not that the changes of life, as exhibited by positive evidence, have been so great but that they have been so small. Be they great or small, however, it is desirable to attempt to estimate them. Let us, therefore, take each great division of the animal world in succession, and, whenever an order or a family can be shown to have had a prolonged existence, let us endeavour to ascertain how far the later members of the group differ from the earlier ones. If these later members, in all or in many cases, exhibit a certain amount of modification, the fact is, so far, evidence in favour of a general law of change; and, in a rough way, the rapidity of that change will be measured by the demonstrable amount of modification. On the other hand, it must be recollected that the absence of any modification, while it may leave the doctrine of the existence of a law of change without positive support, cannot possibly disprove all forms of that doctrine, though it may afford a sufficient refutation of many of them. The PROTOZOA.--The Protozoa are represented throughout the whole range of geological series, from the Lower Silurian formation to the present day. The most ancient forms recently made known by Ehrenberg are exceedingly like those which now exist: no one has ever pretended that the difference between any ancient and any modern Foraminifera is of more than generic value, nor are the oldest Foraminifera either simpler, more embryonic, or less differentiated, than the existing forms. The COELENTERATA.--The Tabulate Corals have existed from the Silurian epoch to the present day, but I am not aware that the ancient _Heliolites_ possesses a single mark of a more embryonic or less differentiated character, or less high organisation, than the existing _Heliopora_. As for the Aporose Corals, in what respect is the Silurian _Paloeocyclus_ less highly organised or more embryonic than the modern _Fungia_, or the Liassic Aporosa than the existing members of the same families? The _Mollusca_--In what sense is the living _Waldheimia_ less embryonic, or more specialised, than the palaeozoic _Spirifer_; or the existing _Rhynchonelloe, Cranioe, Discinoe, Linguloe_, than the Silurian species of the same genera? In what sense can _Loligo_ or _Spirula_ be said to be more specialised, or l
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204  
205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

embryonic

 

Silurian

 
existing
 

change

 

members

 

modification

 

ancient

 

specialised

 

existence

 

amount


doctrine

 
present
 
modern
 

Foraminifera

 
Corals
 
differentiated
 

evidence

 

positive

 

oldest

 

simpler


accumulation

 

existed

 

Tabulate

 

fossiliferous

 

COELENTERATA

 

strata

 

wondered

 

Ehrenberg

 

exceedingly

 
circumstance

generic

 

pretended

 
difference
 

single

 

palaeozoic

 
Spirifer
 

Waldheimia

 
living
 

Mollusca

 
enormous

vegetable

 

Rhynchonelloe

 

Cranioe

 
Spirula
 

Loligo

 

genera

 
Discinoe
 

Linguloe

 

species

 
families