FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   >>  
re are the Faunae of the same area during successive epochs. Show good cause for believing either that these Faunae have been derived from one another by gradual modification, or that the Faunae have reached the area in question by migration from some area in which they have undergone their development. I propose to attempt to deal with this problem, so far as it is exemplified by the distribution of the terrestrial _Vertebrata_, and I shall endeavour to show you that it is capable of solution in a sense entirely favourable to the doctrine of evolution. I have elsewhere[6] stated at length the reasons which lead me to recognise four primary distributional provinces for the terrestrial _Vertebrata_ in the present world, namely,--first, the _Novozelanian_, or New-Zealand province; secondly, the _Australian_ province, including Australia, Tasmania, and the Negrito Islands; thirdly, _Austro-Columbia_, or South America _plus_ North America as far as Mexico; and fourthly, the rest of the world, or _Arctogoea_, in which province America north of Mexico constitutes one sub-province, Africa south of the Sahara a second, Hindostan a third, and the remainder of the Old World a fourth. [Footnote 6: "On the Classification and Distribution of the Alectoromorphoe;" _Proceedings of the Zoological Society_, 1868.] Now the truth which Mr. Darwin perceived and promulgated as "the law of the succession of types" is, that, in all these provinces, the animals found in Pliocene or later deposits are closely affined to those which now inhabit the same provinces; and that, conversely, the forms characteristic of other provinces are absent. North and South America, perhaps, present one or two exceptions to the last rule, but they are readily susceptible of explanation. Thus, in Australia, the later Tertiary mammals are marsupials (possibly with the exception of the Dog and a Rodent or two, as at present). In Austro-Columbia, the later Tertiary fauna exhibits numerous and varied forms of Platyrrhine Apes, Rodents, Cats, Dogs, Stags, _Edentata_, and Opossums; but, as at present, no Catarrhine Apes, no Lemurs, no _Insectivora_, Oxen, Antelopes, Rhinoceroses, nor _Didelphia_ other than Opossums. And in the widespread Arctogaeal province, the Pliocene and later mammals belong to the same groups as those which now exist in the province. The law of succession of types, therefore, holds good for the present epoch as compared with its predecessor.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   >>  



Top keywords:

province

 

present

 
America
 

provinces

 

Faunae

 

Australia

 

Austro

 

Vertebrata

 

terrestrial

 

Tertiary


mammals

 
Opossums
 
Mexico
 

succession

 
Pliocene
 
Columbia
 

believing

 

absent

 

exceptions

 

susceptible


epochs

 

marsupials

 

possibly

 

characteristic

 

explanation

 

readily

 

inhabit

 

gradual

 

modification

 
promulgated

Darwin

 

perceived

 
animals
 

exception

 

conversely

 
affined
 

closely

 
derived
 

deposits

 
Rodent

widespread

 

Arctogaeal

 

Didelphia

 
Antelopes
 

Rhinoceroses

 

belong

 
groups
 

compared

 

predecessor

 
Insectivora