FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224  
225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   >>  
m one of two causes: the moon may really have been moving more swiftly in its orbit; or the earth may have been rotating more slowly on its axis. Laplace believed he had accounted for this phenomenon by the fact that the eccentricity of the earth's orbit has been diminishing throughout these 3,000 years. This would produce a diminution of the mean attraction of the sun on the moon; or, in other words, an increase in the attraction of the earth on the moon; and, consequently, an increase in the rapidity of the orbital motion of the latter body. Laplace, therefore, laid the responsibility of the acceleration upon the moon, and if his views were correct, the tidal retardation must either be insignificant in amount, or be counteracted by some other agency. Our great astronomer, Adams, however, appears to have found a flaw in Laplace's calculation, and to have shown that only half the observed retardation could be accounted for in the way he had suggested. There remains, therefore, the other half to be accounted for; and here, in the absence of all positive knowledge, three sets of hypotheses have been suggested. (_a_.) M. Delaunay suggests that the earth is at fault, in consequence of the tidal retardation. Messrs. Adams, Thomson, and Tait work out this suggestion, and, "on a certain assumption as to the proportion of retardations due to the sun and moon," find the earth may lose twenty-two seconds of time in a century from this cause.[17] [Footnote 17: Sir W. Thomson, _loc. cit_. p. 14.] (_b_.) But M. Dufour suggests that the retardation of the earth (which is hypothetically assumed to exist) may be due in part, or wholly, to the increase of the moment of inertia of the earth by meteors falling upon its surface. This suggestion also meets with the entire approval of Sir W. Thomson, who shows that meteor-dust, accumulating at the rate of one foot in 4,000 years, would account for the remainder of retardation.[18] [Footnote 18: _Ibid._ p. 27.] (_c_.) Thirdly, Sir W. Thomson brings forward an hypothesis of his own with respect to the cause of the hypothetical retardation of the earth's rotation:-- "Let us suppose ice to melt from the polar regions (20 deg. round each pole, we may say) to the extent of something more than a foot thick, enough to give 1.1 foot of water over those areas, or 0.006 of a foot of water if spread over the whole globe, which would, in reality, raise the sea-level by only some such und
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224  
225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   >>  



Top keywords:

retardation

 

Thomson

 
increase
 

accounted

 

Laplace

 

suggestion

 

Footnote

 

suggested

 

suggests

 
attraction

meteor

 

accumulating

 
remainder
 

Thirdly

 

brings

 
forward
 

account

 

wholly

 

assumed

 

hypothetically


Dufour

 
swiftly
 

moment

 

inertia

 

moving

 
entire
 

approval

 
hypothesis
 

meteors

 
falling

surface
 

rotation

 

spread

 
reality
 

extent

 

suppose

 
respect
 

hypothetical

 

regions

 
rotating

appears

 

astronomer

 
produce
 

agency

 

calculation

 

remains

 
observed
 
counteracted
 

amount

 
responsibility