FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237  
238   239   240   241   >>  
nimals which are supposed to be thus related, and not merely with the fragments upon which the genera and species of the palaeontologist are so often based. M. Gaudry has arranged the species of _Hyoenidoe, Proboscidea, Rhinocerotidoe_, and _Equidoe_ in their order of filiation from their earliest appearance in the Miocene epoch to the present time, and Professor Ruetimeyer has drawn up similar schemes for the Oxen and other _Ungulata_--with what, I am disposed to think, is a fair and probable approximation to the order of nature. But, as no one is better aware than these two learned, acute, and philosophical biologists, all such arrangements must be regarded as provisional, except in those cases in which, by a fortunate accident, large series of remains are obtainable from a thick and widespread series of deposits. It is easy to accumulate probabilities--hard to make out some particular case in such a way that it will stand rigorous criticism. After much search, however, I think that such a case is to be made out in favour of the pedigree of the Horses. The genus _Equus_ is represented as far back as the latter part of the Miocene epoch; but in deposits belonging to the middle of that epoch its place is taken by two other genera, _Hipparion_ and _Anchitherium_;[2] and, in the lowest Miocene and upper Eocene, only the last genus occurs. A species of _Anchitherium_ was referred by Cuvier to the _Paloeotheria_ under the name of _P. aurelianense_. The grinding-teeth are in fact very similar in shape and in pattern, and in the absence of any thick layer of cement, to those of some species of _Paloeotherium_, especially Cuvier's _Paloeotherium minus_, which has been formed into a separate genus, _Plagiolophus_, by Pomel. But in the fact that there are only six full- sized grinders in the lower jaw, the first premolar being very small; that the anterior grinders are as large as, or rather larger than, the posterior ones; that the second premolar has an anterior prolongation; and that the posterior molar of the lower jaw has, as Cuvier pointed out, a posterior lobe of much smaller size and different form, the dentition of _Anchitherium_ departs from the type of the _Paloeotherium_, and approaches that of the Horse. [Footnote 2: Hermann von Meyer gave the name of _Anchitherium_ to _A. Ezquerroe_; and in his paper on the subject he takes great pains to distinguish the latter as the type of a new genus, from Cuvier's _Paloeo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237  
238   239   240   241   >>  



Top keywords:

species

 

Anchitherium

 
Cuvier
 

Miocene

 

posterior

 

Paloeotherium

 

grinders

 

premolar

 

anterior

 

deposits


series

 
similar
 
genera
 

Paloeo

 
aurelianense
 
grinding
 

Ezquerroe

 

absence

 

pattern

 

lowest


Eocene

 

Hipparion

 

distinguish

 

subject

 

Hermann

 

Paloeotheria

 

referred

 

occurs

 

smaller

 
pointed

larger

 

prolongation

 
departs
 

approaches

 

Footnote

 
formed
 

dentition

 
separate
 

Plagiolophus

 
cement

schemes

 

Ungulata

 

present

 
Professor
 

Ruetimeyer

 

nature

 
approximation
 

disposed

 

probable

 
appearance