FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1807   1808   1809   1810   1811   1812   1813   1814   1815   1816   1817   1818   1819   1820   1821   1822   1823   1824   1825   1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831  
1832   1833   1834   1835   1836   1837   1838   1839   1840   1841   1842   1843   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   >>   >|  
ingularly favourable result of which contributed not a little to revive the sunken courage of the aristocracy. Helplessness of Pompeius The helplessness of Pompeius in presence of these daring demonstrations, as well as the undignified and almost ridiculous position into which he had fallen with reference to Clodius, deprived him and the coalition of their credit; and the section of the senate which adhered to the regents, demoralized by the singular inaptitude of Pompeius and helplessly left to itself, could not prevent the republican-aristocratic party from regaining completely the ascendency in the corporation. The game of this party really at that time (697) was still by no means desperate for a courageous and dexterous player. It had now--what it had not possessed for a century past--a firm support in the people; if it trusted the people and itself, it might attain its object in the shortest and most honourable way. Why not attack the regents openly and avowedly? Why should not a resolute and eminent man at the head of the senate cancel the extraordinary powers as unconstitutional, and summon all the republicans of Italy to arms against the tyrants and their following? It was possible perhaps in this way once more to restore the rule of the senate. Certainly the republicans would thus play a bold game; but perhaps in this case, as often, the most courageous resolution might have been at the same time the most prudent. Only, it is true, the indolent aristocracy of this period was scarcely capable of so simple and bold a resolution. There was however another way perhaps more sure, at any rate better adapted to the character and nature of these constitutionalists; they might labour to set the two regents at variance and through this variance to attain ultimately to the helm themselves. The relations between the two men ruling the state had become altered and relaxed, now that Caesar had acquired a standing of preponderant power by the side of Pompeius and had compelled the latter to canvass for a new position of command; it was probable that, if he obtained it, there would arise in one way or other a rupture and struggle between them. If Pompeius remained unsupported in this, his defeat was scarcely doubtful, and the constitutional party would in that event find themselves after the close of the conflict under the rule of one master instead of two. But if the nobility employed against Caesar the same mea
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1807   1808   1809   1810   1811   1812   1813   1814   1815   1816   1817   1818   1819   1820   1821   1822   1823   1824   1825   1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831  
1832   1833   1834   1835   1836   1837   1838   1839   1840   1841   1842   1843   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Pompeius

 

senate

 
regents
 

resolution

 

Caesar

 

scarcely

 

variance

 

people

 

attain

 

courageous


republicans

 
aristocracy
 
position
 

nature

 
constitutionalists
 
simple
 

character

 

adapted

 

capable

 

period


nobility

 

employed

 

conflict

 

indolent

 

master

 

prudent

 

doubtful

 

relaxed

 

acquired

 
altered

standing

 

obtained

 
canvass
 

probable

 

compelled

 
preponderant
 

rupture

 
unsupported
 

defeat

 
constitutional

command

 

labour

 

ultimately

 
remained
 

struggle

 

ruling

 
relations
 

section

 

adhered

 
demoralized