FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249  
250   251   252   253   254   255   >>  
ography); A. Tobler, in the _Grundriss der romanischen Philologie_, I. (1888), pp. 253-63; H. Paul, in the _Grundriss der germanischen Philologie_, I., 2nd ed. (1896), pp. 184-96. In French read the section _Critique des textes, in Minerva, Introduction a l'etude des classiques scolaires grecs et latins_, by J. Gow and S. Reinach (Paris, 1890, 16mo), pp. 50-65. The work of J. Taylor, "History of the Transmission of Ancient Books to Modern Times" (Liverpool, 1889, 16mo), is of no value. [69] This rule is not absolute. The editor is generally accorded the right of unifying the spelling of an autograph document--provided that he informs the public of the fact--wherever, as in most modern documents, the orthographical vagaries of the author possess no philological interest. See the _Instructions pour la publication des textes historiques_, in the _Bulletin de la Commission royale d'histoire de Belgique_, 5th series, vi. (1896); and the _Grundsaetze fuer die Herausgabe von Actenstuecken zur neueren Geschichte_, laboriously discussed by the second and third Congresses of German historians, in 1894 and 1895, in the Deutsche _Zeitschrift fuer Geschichtswissenschaft_, xi. p. 200, xii. p. 364. The last Congresses of Italian historians, held at Genoa (1893) and at Rome (1895), have also debated this question, but without result. What are the liberties which it is legitimate to take in reproducing autograph texts? The question is more difficult than is imagined by those who are not professionally concerned with it. [70] Interpolations will be treated of in chapter iii p. 92. [71] The scribes of the Carlovingian Renaissance and of the Renaissance proper of the fifteenth century endeavoured to furnish intelligible texts. They therefore corrected everything they did not understand. Several ancient works have been in this manner irretrievably ruined. [72] The principal of these are, for the classical languages, besides the above-mentioned work of Blass (_supra_, p. 74, note), the _Adversaria critica_ of Madvig (Copenhagen, 1871-74, 3 vols. 8vo). For Greek, the celebrated _Commentatio palaeographica_ of F. J. Bast, published as an appendix to an edition of the grammarian Gregory of Corinth (Leipzig, 1811, 8vo), and the _Variae lectiones_ of Cobet (Leiden, 1873, 8vo). For Latin, H. Hagen, _Gradus ad criticen_ (Leipzig, 1879, 8vo), and W. M. Lindsay, "An Introduction to Latin Textual Emendation based on the Text of Plautus" (Lo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249  
250   251   252   253   254   255   >>  



Top keywords:
Congresses
 

historians

 

autograph

 

Leipzig

 

Renaissance

 

Introduction

 

Philologie

 

Grundriss

 

textes

 
question

Several

 

Carlovingian

 

scribes

 

understand

 

furnish

 

corrected

 

intelligible

 
endeavoured
 
proper
 
fifteenth

century

 

professionally

 

reproducing

 

difficult

 

legitimate

 

result

 

liberties

 

imagined

 
treated
 

chapter


Interpolations
 
ancient
 

concerned

 
mentioned
 
lectiones
 
Variae
 

Leiden

 

Corinth

 
appendix
 
published

edition
 

grammarian

 

Gregory

 
Gradus
 
Emendation
 

Plautus

 

Textual

 

criticen

 

Lindsay

 

classical