FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36  
37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   >>   >|  
d piece of 1599." He adds: "_Julius Caesar_ was certainly not unconcerned in the revival of the fashion for tragedies of revenge with a ghost in them, which suddenly set in with Marston's _Antonio and Mellida_ and Chettle's _Hoffman_ in 1601." Dr. Furnivall, a strong advocate for 1601 as the date of composition, has suggested[1] that Essex's ill-judged rebellion against Queen Elizabeth, on Sunday, February 8, 1601, was the reason of Shakespeare's producing his _Julius Caesar_ in that year. "Assuredly," he says, "the citizens of London in that year who heard Shakespeare's play must have felt the force of '_Et tu, Brute_,' and must have seen Brutus's death, with keener and more home-felt influence than we feel and hear the things with now." Drayton's revised version of his _Mortimeriados_ (1596-1597); published in 1603 under the title of _The Barons' Wars_, has a passage which strongly resembles some lines in Antony's last speech (V, v, 73-74), but common property in the idea that a well-balanced mixture of the four elements (earth, air, fire, and water) produces a perfect man invalidates any argument for the date of the play based upon this evidence. See note, p. 167, l. 73. INTERNAL EVIDENCE Dr. W. A. Wright[2] has argued against an earlier date than 1600 for the composition of _Julius Caesar_ from the use of 'eternal' for 'infernal' in I, ii, 160. See note, p. 20, l. 160. Of course there is no certainty that Shakespeare wished to use the word 'infernal,' and, besides, if any substitution was made, it may have been at a later date. But adumbrations of _Hamlet_ everywhere in _Julius Caesar_, the frequent references to Caesar in _Hamlet_, the kinship in character of Brutus and Hamlet (see note, p. 46, l. 65), the treatment of the supernatural, and the development of the revenge motive give strong cumulative evidence that the composition of _Julius Caesar_ is in time very near to that of _Hamlet_, the first Shakespearian draft of which is now generally conceded to date from the first months of 1602. The diction of _Julius Caesar_, the quality of the blank verse, the style generally (see below, Versification and Diction), all point to 1601 as the probable date of composition. It has been said that a true taste for Shakespeare is like the creation of a special sense; and this saying is nowhere better approved than in reference to his subtile variations of language and style. He began with what may be described as
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36  
37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Caesar

 

Julius

 

composition

 

Hamlet

 

Shakespeare

 

revenge

 

generally

 

evidence

 

Brutus

 
strong

infernal
 
substitution
 

adumbrations

 
INTERNAL
 

earlier

 
argued
 
EVIDENCE
 

Wright

 

eternal

 

certainty


wished

 

creation

 
special
 
probable
 

language

 

variations

 

approved

 

reference

 

subtile

 

Diction


Versification

 

development

 

supernatural

 

motive

 

cumulative

 

treatment

 

references

 
kinship
 

character

 

quality


diction

 

Shakespearian

 
conceded
 

months

 

frequent

 

property

 
February
 
reason
 

producing

 
Assuredly