FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56  
57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   >>   >|  
onnection the world has with God, if he seeks to trace back all that now is to the very fountain head of life, if he desires to discover some unifying principle, some illuminating purpose in the history of the world, he may still turn to the early chapters of Genesis as a safe guide. What, then, is the bearing of the conclusions of modern science upon the permanent value of the Old Testament? Science has compelled the Bible student to withdraw the attention from the nonessential and secondary, and to concentrate it upon the heart and substance. In doing this it has established upon a much firmer basis the conviction that, whatever the scientific value of scripture may be or may not be, the apostle was right when he wrote that "the sacred writings ... are able to make wise unto salvation through {63} faith which is in Christ Jesus. Every scripture inspired of God is also profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for instruction which is in righteousness: that the man of God may be complete, furnished completely unto every good work."[35] NOTES ON CHAPTER II [1] Burgon, Inspiration and Interpretation, p. 89. [2] Presbyterian Review, 1881, p. 238. [3] Josh. 10. 12. [4] The Bible--Its Meaning and Supremacy, p. 160. [5] In a brief treatment it seems preferable to confine the discussion to a specific concrete case; therefore this chapter deals almost exclusively with questions centering around the subject of cosmogony. [6] The margin of the Authorized Version still gives the chronology of Archbishop Ussher to that effect. [7] Chapter IV, 1. [8] The Expositor, 1902, pp. 159, 160. [9] It requires but a reading of the "proofs" of the opposite view to understand their weakness. Compare Expositor, 1886, pp. 287-289. [10] The book of Genesis, p. 4. [11] Another difficulty has been found in the statement of Genesis that "vegetation" was complete two days before animal life appeared, but the disagreement is more apparent than real. The geological record, it is true, shows many more animal than plant remains in the very ancient rocks. It was not until Devonian and Carboniferous times that the plants became very abundant, as far as the geological records go. Indeed, in the oldest rocks in which animal remains occur, no plant remains have been discovered. However, this is not to be {64} taken as proving that animals existed before plants, because low forms of the latter, having no hard
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56  
57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Genesis

 

remains

 

animal

 

geological

 

scripture

 

Expositor

 

complete

 

plants

 

specific

 
concrete

confine
 

opposite

 

preferable

 
proofs
 

reading

 

requires

 
discussion
 

Chapter

 
effect
 

cosmogony


margin
 

exclusively

 

centering

 

subject

 

questions

 

Authorized

 

Archbishop

 

Ussher

 

chronology

 

chapter


Version

 

Another

 

existed

 
Devonian
 

Carboniferous

 

ancient

 

record

 
abundant
 

discovered

 
However

oldest
 
Indeed
 

records

 

animals

 

proving

 

difficulty

 

weakness

 

Compare

 
statement
 

disagreement